Variation of gravitational force with calculus

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on Newton's universal law of gravitation, emphasizing that gravitational force increases as the distance between two objects decreases. Participants explore how to compute instantaneous acceleration and orbital velocity using calculus and Newton's second law. For circular orbits, the acceleration can be calculated by dividing the gravitational force by the mass of the orbiting object, with the centripetal acceleration formula v^2/r being relevant. The conversation highlights that different orbital configurations, such as elliptical orbits, require distinct velocities. Overall, the calculations can often be simplified by approximating one mass as stationary when it is significantly larger than the other.
albertrichardf
Messages
165
Reaction score
11
Hi all,

This is Newton's universal law of gravitation:

F = GMm/r2, where r is the distance between the centre of the two bodies.

Therefore, considering two objects in mutual gravitational acceleration, with only linear motion and acceleration, they shall be moving in closer and closer. Since the force is inversely proportional to the distance between the two bodies centre, it will increase as r decreases. Therefore as they move gravitational force gets stronger and stronger.

The question is, how to compute the instantaneous acceleration in those conditions using calculus?

Also, considering the two objects again, how would I compute the velocity needed for mass m to enter in orbit around mass M?

Thanks for any answers
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The instantaneous acceleration is pretty easy to find simply by applying Newton's second law. What's Newton's second law tell you? This should not require any calculus.

Computing the orbital velocity requires knowledge of which orbit you are talking about. Different orbits require different velocities.

In the case of elliptical orbits, there is no 1 velocity that is the "orbit velocity" because by Kepler's 2nd law, the orbiting object moves fastest when it is closest to the gravitating body.

Circular orbits have 1 velocity, and they depend on the distance R from which you are orbiting. The problem is easier still when one object (say M) is much more massive than the other object so we can make an approximation that M just stays stationary (just an approximation).

Which conditions are you considering?
 
So my acceleration at any point would be the magnitude of the force at the distance r divided by the mass of object 2?
The conditions I am considering are a circular orbit of distance r, where mass M around which mass m orbits can be approximated to remain stationary.

Thanks.
 
I believe in that case you simply find the magnitude of the force and calculate the acceleration. Since you have a circular orbit, the distance between the two objects will not change and you will have no variation in either the force or the acceleration.
 
Albertrichardf said:
So my acceleration at any point would be the magnitude of the force at the distance r divided by the mass of object 2?
The conditions I am considering are a circular orbit of distance r, where mass M around which mass m orbits can be approximated to remain stationary.

Thanks.

You should be careful to specify which object you are talking about. The acceleration of object 2 will be the force you wrote down divided by the mass of object 2.

For a circular orbit, you can use the above fact AND the fact that for circular motion the centripetal acceleration is v^2/r. Using these two facts, you can set the two accelerations equal to each other and solve for the velocity. This should also only require algebra. Although deriving a=v^2/r takes a little bit of vector manipulation. You should be able to find that in any introductory physics textbook.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
I passed a motorcycle on the highway going the opposite direction. I know I was doing 125/km/h. I estimated that the frequency of his motor dropped by an entire octave, so that's a doubling of the wavelength. My intuition is telling me that's extremely unlikely. I can't actually calculate how fast he was going with just that information, can I? It seems to me, I have to know the absolute frequency of one of those tones, either shifted up or down or unshifted, yes? I tried to mimic the...
Back
Top