Variation of S with fixed end points

  • Thread starter Thread starter Leb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Points Variation
Leb
Messages
87
Reaction score
0
Not really a homework question, just the notes are confusing me.

Homework Statement


Let S be a functional.

(Given without proof)
If S is differentiable its derivative \delta S is uniquely defined as
\delta S = \int_{x_{0}}^{x_{1}}\frac{\delta S}{\delta \gamma} \delta \gamma dx where \frac{\delta S}{\delta \gamma}

For functional S
S[\gamma]=\int_{x_{0}}^{x_{1}}L(x,y(x),y'(x))dx
the variation is defined by
\delta S=\int_{x_{0}}^{x_{1}}\left( \frac{\partial{L}}{\partial{y}}-\frac{d}{dx}\frac{\partial{L}}{\partial{y'}}\right)\delta \gamma dx + \left.\frac{\partial{L}}{\partial{y'}}\delta \gamma \right|_{x_{0}}^{x_{1}}

Define \delta \gamma = \epsilon h(x) where \epsilon =const.<< 1 and h(x) is an arbitrary (perturbation) function.

Now, the notes given by the lecturer say, that if end points are fixed i.e. h(x_{0})=h(x_{1})=0 the variation simplifies to

\frac{\delta S}{\delta \gamma}= \frac{\partial{L}}{\partial{y}}-\frac{d}{dx}\frac{\partial{L}}{\partial{y'}}

I do not understand, how do we get this (I get how the last term in the variation vanishes). Is this the functional derivative now or just delta S divided by delta gamma ?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Leb said:
Not really a homework question, just the notes are confusing me.

Homework Statement


Let S be a functional.

(Given without proof)
If S is differentiable its derivative \delta S is uniquely defined as
\delta S = \int_{x_{0}}^{x_{1}}\frac{\delta S}{\delta \gamma} \delta \gamma dx where \frac{\delta S}{\delta \gamma}

For functional S
S[\gamma]=\int_{x_{0}}^{x_{1}}L(x,y(x),y'(x))dx
the variation is defined by
\delta S=\int_{x_{0}}^{x_{1}}\left( \frac{\partial{L}}{\partial{y}}-\frac{d}{dx}\frac{\partial{L}}{\partial{y'}}\right)\delta \gamma dx + \left.\frac{\partial{L}}{\partial{y'}}\delta \gamma \right|_{x_{0}}^{x_{1}}
If h(x_0)= h(x_1)= 0, that last term is 0 and the result follows by differentiating both sides.

Define \delta \gamma = \epsilon h(x) where \epsilon =const.<< 1 and h(x) is an arbitrary (perturbation) function.

Now, the notes given by the lecturer say, that if end points are fixed i.e. h(x_{0})=h(x_{1})=0 the variation simplifies to

\frac{\delta S}{\delta \gamma}= \frac{\partial{L}}{\partial{y}}-\frac{d}{dx}\frac{\partial{L}}{\partial{y'}}

I do not understand, how do we get this (I get how the last term in the variation vanishes). Is this the functional derivative now or just delta S divided by delta gamma ?

Thanks!
 
Thanks for your input.I get how the last term vanishes. But how do you differentiate the first term ? How does \frac{\delta S}{\delta \gamma} appear ?
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top