Variational Technique for Derivatives of $\phi$

  • Thread starter Thread starter arroy_0205
  • Start date Start date
arroy_0205
Messages
127
Reaction score
0
Suppose I try to find variation of the term \phi^2 under variation of \phi i.e., (\delta \phi). Then I take derivative of \phi^2 with respect to \phi and multiply by \delta \phi. In case of more complicated objects containing derivative of \phi what is the procedure? for example:
<br /> \delta(\sqrt{\eta^{\mu \nu}\partial_{\mu}\phi \partial_{\nu}\phi})<br />
what is the variation of this quantity under variation of \phi?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is the rule here
<br /> \delta(\sqrt{\eta^{\mu \nu}\partial_{\mu}\phi \partial_{\nu}\phi})=\frac{\partial(\sqrt{\eta^{\mu \nu}\partial_{\mu}\phi \partial_{\nu}\phi})}{\partial \phi}\delta(\eta^{\mu \nu}\partial_{\mu}\phi \partial_{\nu}\phi)<br />
But then the derivative part creates problem. The part under square root depends on derivative of \phi and not on \phi itself, so the result is zero. I am confused.
 
Last edited:
Always go back to the definition of the derivative:

\delta F[\phi] = F[\phi + \delta \phi] - F[\phi].

In any case, in your case the chain rule applies:
<br /> <br /> \delta(\sqrt{\eta^{\mu \nu}\partial_{\mu}\phi \partial_{\nu}\phi})=<br /> \frac{1}{ 2\sqrt{\eta^{\mu \nu}\partial_{\mu}\phi \partial_{\nu}\phi} }<br /> \delta(\eta^{\mu \nu}\partial_{\mu}\phi \partial_{\nu}\phi)<br /> <br />
 
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top