Varying Forms for an Equation of a Line in R^3

  • Thread starter Thread starter kieth89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forms Line
kieth89
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
I was doing some course work earlier today and noticed that I've seen two different equations for a line in 3D space. Usually the equation I use is:
\vec r(t)=<x_{0}, y_{0}, z_{0}> + t<x, y, z>
You plug in the various points with what the problem provides. However, a few times I have seen a problem that uses the equation:
\vec r(t)=<x_{0}, y_{0}, z_{0}> + t<x-x_{0}, y-y_{0}, z-z_{0}>

How do I know which equation to use? Or are these equivalent?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can define a line either with 1 point and a directing vector, or with 2 points.
The first form of is the definition of a line passing through ##M_0 = (x_0,y_0,z_0)## and directed by ##\vec u = (x,y,z)##, while the second form is the definition of a line passing through ##M_0 ## and ##M = (x,y,z) ## (directed by ##\vec{ M_0M}##)
 
  • Like
Likes kieth89
Oh, that makes perfect sense. Thank you!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top