Vector Analysis Identity simplification/manipulation

jspectral
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let \mathbf{G}(x,y,z) be an irrotational vector field and g(x,y,z) a C^1 function. Use vector identities to simplify:

\nabla\cdot(g\nabla \times (g\mathbf{G}))


Homework Equations



The '14 basic vector identities'

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried using the identity \nabla\cdot(\mathbf{F} \times \mathbf{G}) = \mathbf{G}\cdot(\nabla\times\mathbf{F}) - \mathbf{F}\cdot(\nabla\times\mathbf{G})

But I'm not sure if i can treat g\nabla as a vector?

Really I'm quite clueless.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, I wouldn't treat g\nabla as a vector, it's an operator. Start from the inside. You've got curl(gG). Irrotational tells you curl(G)=0. How does that let you simplify curl(gG)? BTW curl(X)=\nabla\times\mathbf{X}. div(X)=\nabla\cdot\mathbf{X}.
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top