Vector potential and constant magnetic flux density

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on verifying that the vector potential A = 1/2(-yB0, xB0, 0) yields a constant magnetic flux density B0 in the z direction. The correct approach involves using the relation B = ∇ × A, with clarification that the symbol ∇ should be used. Participants suggest writing out the components of the curl of A in Cartesian coordinates to facilitate the proof. The conversation emphasizes the need for a mathematical method to confirm the relationship between vector potential and magnetic flux density. This analytical verification is essential for understanding the properties of magnetic fields in the specified configuration.
skyboarder2
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I would like to verify analytically that a vector potential of the form A=1/2(-yB0,xB0,0) produces a constant magnetic flux density of magnitude B0 in the z direction.
(I guess I'd have to use the relation B=\forall\wedgeA...)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That is correct (assuming you meant to write the symbol \nabla). Do you have a question?
 
Nope, I just look for a method to prove it mathematically
 
Write out the components of \vec{\nabla} \times \vec{A} in Cartesian coordinates.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top