Vector Potential of Spinning Sphere

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving the vector potential of a spinning sphere, referencing Griffiths' approach for a spinning shell. A participant attempts to calculate the current density using a different orientation, specifically along the z-axis, but encounters a result of zero due to the integration of sine and cosine functions over a full period. They explore the possibility of using linear algebra and tensor notation for the cross product to avoid this issue. Ultimately, they realize that applying spherical harmonics and symmetry can yield the correct result, confirming the validity of this alternative method. The conversation highlights the importance of mathematical techniques in solving physics problems effectively.
Shinobii
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I am just wondering, in Griffiths text, he solves this problem for a spinning shell. He states that the problem is easier if you tilt the sphere so it is spinning in the xz plane.

Homework Equations



When solving for the current density, Griffiths writes,

$$
(\omega \times r') =
\begin{vmatrix}
\hat{x} & \hat{y} & \hat{z} \\
\omega \sin(\psi') & 0 & \omega \cos(\psi') \\
r' \sin(\theta') \cos(\phi') & r' \sin(\theta') \sin(\phi') & r' \cos(\theta')
\end{vmatrix}
$$

The Attempt at a Solution



But suppose we want to try it on the z-axis such that,

$$
(\omega \times r') =
\begin{vmatrix}
\hat{x} & \hat{y} & \hat{z} \\
0 & 0 & \omega \\
r' \sin(\theta') \cos(\phi') & r' \sin(\theta') \sin(\phi') & r' \cos(\theta')
\end{vmatrix}
$$

Doing this however yields an answer of 0! Since,

$$
\int_0^{2 \pi} sin(\phi') d\phi' = \int_0^{2 \pi} cos(\phi') d\phi' = 0
$$

Does anyone have insight to if this problem is solvable using the second method? I ask this, because this is what I would do in an exam situation!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, you might consider losing the determinant calculation. If you are at this level of mathematics, you might as well use linear algebra rather than a mnemonic, if not using the tensor definition of the cross product.

Define the cross product of two vectors, ##\vec{a}## and ##\vec{b}##, as ##\vec{a}\times\vec{b}=\left[\begin{matrix} 0 & -a_3 & a_2 \\ a_3 & 0 & -a_1 \\ -a_2 & a_1 & 0 \end{matrix}\right]\left[\begin{matrix} b_1 \\ b_2 \\ b_3 \end{matrix}\right]##, where ##a_i## is the ith component of the ##\mathbb{R}^3## vector ##\vec{a}##, with ##b_i## defined similarly.

Assuming that ##\omega## and r' are not scalar multiples of each other, the cross product should not reduce to the zero (probably not 0!=1 either) vector.
 
Hmm, mathematics aside (I completely disagree with you, the mnemonic is simple to understand physically, while tensor notation is required for more difficult problems (such as relativistic electrodynamics), this problem is rather simple) you will still get zero. I am not worried about my terms cancelling out, it is the integration that sets my answer to zero. . .
 
Ah, I see now that I can exploit spherical harmonics and symmetry which leaves me with the correct result! Since,

$$
\sin(\theta')\cos(\phi') = - \sqrt{\frac{8 \pi}{3}}{\rm{Re}}[Y_{1,1}(\theta', \phi')]
$$

Then by orthogonality everything should fall into place (I have not done this but I will do so right away and verify that it works).

Yep, this method works fine and dandy! Thanks again Mandelbroth, I appreciate you taking the time to reply.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top