Vector Spaces: Cartesian vs Tensor products

Monte_Carlo
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have a problem understanding the difference between Cartesian product of vector spaces and tensor product. Let V1 and V2 be vector spaces. V1 x V2 is Cartesian product and V1 xc V2 is tensor product (xc for x circled). How many dimensions are in V1 x V2 vs V1 xc V2?

Thanks,

Monte
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It really depends how you define addition on cartesian products. The usual definition is

(v_1+v_2,w_1+w_2)=(v_1,w_1)+(v_2,w_2)

In this case, the cartesian product is usually called a direct sum, written as V \oplus W.
If you think about it, this 'product' is more like a sum--for instance, if v_1,v_2,...v_n are a basis for V and w_1,w_2,...w_m are a basis for W, then a basis for V \oplus W is given by
v_1 \oplus 0, ..., v_n \oplus 0, 0 \oplus w_1, ..., 0 \oplus w_m, and so the dimension is n+m

A tensor product, on the other hand, is actually a product (which can be thought of as a concatenation of two vectors) that obeys the distributive law:

(v_1+v_2)\otimes (w_1+w_2)=v_1 \otimes w_1 + v_1 \otimes w_2 + v_2 \otimes w_1 + v_2 \otimes w_2

One basis is
v_1 \otimes w_1, v_1 \otimes w_2, ..., v_2 \otimes w_1, ..., ..., v_n \otimes w_m
and the space has dimension mn (as expected of a product).
 
I'm having a hard time following because my computer doesn't show the symbols in a standard mathematical notation. Would you be able to refer to some online source with the same information?
 
if a,b,c and x,y are bases of V, W then (a,0),(b,0),(c,0),(0,x),(0,y) is a basis of the cartesian product VxW, while (a,x), (b,x),(c,x),(a,y),(b,y),(c,y) is a basis of the tensor product VtensW.

so dimension is additive for cartesian product and multiplicative for tensor product.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Back
Top