Vectors in spherical coordinates

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the representation of the polarization vector \(\epsilon\) in spherical coordinates and the confusion surrounding its notation. The textbook provides expressions for the spherical components of \(\epsilon\) in terms of Cartesian components, specifically \(\epsilon_1\), \(\epsilon_0\), and \(\epsilon_{-1}\). Clarification is offered regarding the notation, as subscripts can vary between sources, leading to misunderstandings. The correct spherical representation is restated, aligning the components with their respective Cartesian equivalents. Understanding these notations is crucial for studying selection rules and the spectrum of one-electron atoms.
eoghan
Messages
201
Reaction score
7
Hi! I'm studying the selection rules and the spectrum of one-electron atoms. In the textbook it is said: "It is convenient to introduce the spherical components of the vector \epsilon which are given in terms of its Cartesian components by:

\epsilon_1=-\frac{1}{\sqrt2}(\epsilon_x+i\epsilon_y)
\epsilon_0=\epsilon_z
\epsilon_-1=-\frac{1}{\sqrt2}(\epsilon_x-i\epsilon_y)

Can you please explain me these expressions?
I thought that
\epsilon_1=sin\theta cos\phi
\epsilon_2=sin\theta sin\phi
\epsilon_3=cos\theta

so I can't understand the expressions given in the textbookP.s. \epsilon is the polarization vector, so it's a unit vector
 
Physics news on Phys.org
eoghan said:
Hi! I'm studying the selection rules and the spectrum of one-electron atoms. In the textbook it is said: "It is convenient to introduce the spherical components of the vector \epsilon which are given in terms of its Cartesian components by:

\epsilon_1=-\frac{1}{\sqrt2}(\epsilon_x+i\epsilon_y)
\epsilon_0=\epsilon_z
\epsilon_-1=-\frac{1}{\sqrt2}(\epsilon_x-i\epsilon_y)

Can you please explain me these expressions?
I thought that
\epsilon_1=sin\theta cos\phi
\epsilon_2=sin\theta sin\phi
\epsilon_3=cos\theta

so I can't understand the expressions given in the textbook


P.s. \epsilon is the polarization vector, so it's a unit vector

It looks like you are confused about notation and I don't blame you. Sometimes subscripts 1,2,3 are used respectively for x,y,z and sometimes not. The confusion arises when you consult different sources using differing notations. Let me recast the unit vectors as follows:

\epsilon_+=-\frac{1}{\sqrt2}(\epsilon_x+i\epsilon_y)
\epsilon_0=\epsilon_z
\epsilon_-=-\frac{1}{\sqrt2}(\epsilon_x-i\epsilon_y)

where

\epsilon_x=sin\theta cos\phi
\epsilon_y=sin\theta sin\phi
\epsilon_z=cos\theta

This should keep the meanings of the subscripts clear for you.
 
Thank you!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top