Converting Between Component and Magnitude-Angle Notations

  • Thread starter Thread starter Llama77
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vectors
AI Thread Summary
In a Cartesian coordinate system, the x and y components of a vector in magnitude-angle notation can be calculated using ax = a cos(θ) and ay = a sin(θ), even when the vector is in the negative quadrant. To convert from component notation to magnitude-angle notation, the angle θ is determined using the arctan function, as tan(θ) = ay/ax. The reason for using arctan is that it is the inverse function of tangent, allowing the calculation of the angle from the ratio of the components. This process involves constructing a right triangle where the hypotenuse represents the vector's magnitude, and the components are the legs of the triangle. Understanding these conversions is essential for accurately analyzing vectors in physics.
Llama77
Messages
113
Reaction score
0
So I am in a Calculus based Physics course and had some questions about converting to and from the component notation and the magnitude-angle notation.

The first is if I am in the magnitude-angle notation, in a Cartesian cordiante system, will it always be ax=a cos(theta) to get the x component and ay=a sin(theta) to get the 7 component. I am asking because I am a little confused, let's day if the vector is ib the negative quadrant 4, do we sill do the same process.


Secondly when going from components to magnitude-angle notation, we use arctan(ay/ax) to get the angle theta. But what I don't get is why, the book just says tan(theta)=(ay/ax) and though I know enough since I have been told to use the arctan, I don't know why we use it or why the book doesn't say this,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A vector can be written in component form as a=(ax,ay). The components of a vector can be found by constructing a right angled triangle and using trigonometry. As an example, consider the vector a at an angle θ from the horizontal. Now consider drawing a line from the end of the vector, down to the x axis. We now have a triangle involving the magnitude of a as the hypotenuse, and ax and ay, the magnitude of the components.

Using trigonometry on the triangle we can obtain ax=acosθ (where a is the magnitude of a) and tanθ=ay/ax.
 
I know that already, but why do we need to use a arctan instead of just the standard tan.
 
Llama77 said:
I know that already, but why do we need to use a arctan instead of just the standard tan.

arctan is the inverse operator of tan, otherwise written as tan-1. So, given the equation tanθ=ay/ax, taking the inverse tangent of each side, we obtain arctan(tanθ)=arctan(ay/ax) => θ= arctan(ay/ax).
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top