I Velocity 4-Vector for Light Ray

MikeLizzi
Messages
239
Reaction score
6
I hope I'm not violating Forum protocol, again.
I tried posting this question in the Homework section but it got locked for violating homework protocol.

My understanding for the relativistic transformation of a velocity u to u' is given by
$$
\begin{bmatrix}
\gamma_{u'} \\
\gamma_{u'} u'_x \\
\gamma_{u'} u'_y \\
\gamma_{u'} u'_z
\end{bmatrix}
=
\begin{bmatrix}

\gamma & -\gamma\beta_x & -\gamma\beta_y & -\gamma\beta_z \\
-\gamma\beta_x & 1+\frac{(\gamma -1)\beta_x^2}{\beta^2} & \frac{(\gamma -1)\beta_x\beta_y}{\beta^2} & \frac{(\gamma -1)\beta_x \beta_z}{\beta^2} \\

-\gamma\beta_y & \frac{(\gamma -1)\beta_x\beta_y}{\beta^2} & 1+\frac{(\gamma -1)\beta_y^2}{\beta^2} & \frac{(\gamma -1)\beta_y\beta_z}{\beta^2} \\

-\gamma\beta_z & \frac{(\gamma -1)\beta_x\beta_z}{\beta^2} & \frac{(\gamma -1)\beta_y\beta_z}{\beta^2} & 1+\frac{(\gamma -1)\beta_z^2}{\beta^2}

\end{bmatrix}
\begin{bmatrix}
\gamma_{u} \\
\gamma_{u} u_x \\
\gamma_{u} u_y \\
\gamma_{u} u_z
\end{bmatrix}
$$
Where v is the velocity of reference frame S' with respect to reference frame S and
$$
\beta_x = v_x/c \\
\beta_y = v_y/c \\
\beta_y = v_y/c \\
\beta^2 = \beta_x^2 + \beta_y^2 + \beta_z^2 \\
\gamma = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\beta^2}} \\
\gamma_u = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\beta_u^2}} \\
\gamma_{u'} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\beta_{u'}^2}}
$$
This seems to work for any object whose velocity is less that c. But, I got the impression from a previous post that I could transform the velocity of light rays the same way I transformed the velocity of massive objects.

If I try to do that using the definitions I have above it means calculating $$\gamma_u$$ for a light ray. That's undefined. I have a 3-vector version of the velocity addition formula that doesn't require such a calculation and it works fine. Did I get the 4-vector structure wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For a "light ray" there is no four-velocity in the usual sense, because it's light-like. You can take a photon (which is a quantum of the quantized electromagnetic field) momentum as a substitute. The corresponding four-momentum is
$$(p^{\mu})=\begin{pmatrix} |\vec{p}| \\ \vec{p} \end{pmatrix}.$$
It transforms as a four vector. The mass of a photon is ##p_{\mu} p^{\mu}=0##, i.e., it's a massless quantum. Of course this doesn't change under Lorentz transformations, thus a photon has a lightlike momentum in any frame, and the three-velocity is
$$\vec{v}=\frac{c\vec{p}}{|\vec{p}|} \; \Rightarrow \; |\vec{v}|=c,$$
i.e., the photon travels with the speed of light in any frame.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top