Velocity and Acceleration on a Rotating Disk?

AI Thread Summary
When standing on a rotating disk and walking along a straight radial line, the linear velocity is calculated using the formula v = ωr, where ω is the angular velocity and r is the distance from the center. The acceleration consists of both centripetal acceleration and the radial component due to walking, necessitating vector addition to determine the total velocity and acceleration. The total acceleration can be derived by differentiating the velocity vector, accounting for both components. Understanding the motion involves recognizing the influence of the disk's rotation on the overall velocity and acceleration. The discussion clarifies the necessity of considering both linear and angular motion in this scenario.
aks_sky
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If you are standing on a rotating disk which is rotating at a constant angular velocity and you walk with a speed v along a straight radial line, then what are you velocity and acceleration?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I just wanted to check if the linear velocity in this case will be:

v=w*r

and then the acceleration will just be the centripetal acceleration or am i understanding it wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem says that you're moving along a straight radial line - imagine that the disk has a straight line from the circumference to the centre, and, as the disk rotates, you start at the centre and walk along this line to the edge. If you were standing in one spot on the disk, then you would have v = r \omega and a = \frac{v^2}{r}, but in the situation described, there is an additional component. I think it should just be vector addition of velocities (in two dimensions), and acceleration would be found by differentiating the vector of velocity.
 
cheers. i get it now
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top