Velocity as a function of position problem (simple i think)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the acceleration of a particle when its velocity is given as a function of position, specifically v(x) = 20 - (2/3)x. To find acceleration at x = 15, participants suggest using the chain rule and differentiating the velocity function with respect to time. There is also a debate on how to demonstrate that the particle never reaches x = 30, with suggestions to solve the differential equation dx/dt = 20 - (2/3)x to show x remains less than 30 for all time. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between position, velocity, and acceleration in this context.
member 428835

Homework Statement


If we know that velocity v of a particle as a funciton of position x is: $$v(x)=20-2/3x$$
then i am asked to determine the acceleration when x=15. I am then asked to show that the particle never actually reaches x=30

Homework Equations


$$vdv=adx$$
$$vdt=dx$$
$$adt=dv$$

and a is the acceleration (not necessarily constant) and t is time.

The Attempt at a Solution


I have already reduced the problem to what we see in 1. I have tried to work with the relevant equations but i can't make sense of the second two since they are time-dependent, which is a variable i have no information on. However, intuitively, i feel to answer the second part i would take a limit as t approaches infinity, so I am conflicted.

Thanks everyone for the help! you people are awesome!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
joshmccraney said:

Homework Statement


If we know that velocity v of a particle as a funciton of position x is: $$v(x)=20-2/3x$$
then i am asked to determine the acceleration when x=15. I am then asked to show that the particle never actually reaches x=30


Homework Equations


$$vdv=adx$$
$$vdt=dx$$
$$adt=dv$$

and a is the acceleration (not necessarily constant) and t is time.


The Attempt at a Solution


I have already reduced the problem to what we see in 1. I have tried to work with the relevant equations but i can't make sense of the second two since they are time-dependent, which is a variable i have no information on. However, intuitively, i feel to answer the second part i would take a limit as t approaches infinity, so I am conflicted.

Thanks everyone for the help! you people are awesome!
v(x)=20-2/3x$
By the way, is that
\displaystyle \ v(x)=20-\frac{2}{3x}\ ?​
... or is that
\displaystyle \ v(x)=20-\frac{2}{3}x\ ?​

You need to find the velocity, v, when x = 15 ?


Then, take the derivative of v with respect to t . (Both sides of the equation.)
 
i thought order of operations made it linear, that is,
\displaystyle \ v(x)=20-\frac{2}{3}x\​
but i guess youre probably used to posts getting sloppy?
SammyS said:
v(x)=20-2/3x$

You need to find the velocity, v, when x = 15 ?
wait, no, i need to find acceleration when x = 15. i think that's what i posted

SammyS said:
v(x)=20-2/3x$
Then, take the derivative of v with respect to t . (Both sides of the equation.)
yes, this i know, but there are no t's. i assume position is a function of time, and thus i have to reckon with the chain rule. can you elaborate on what you mean?
 
joshmccraney said:
i thought order of operations made it linear, that is,
\displaystyle \ v(x)=20-\frac{2}{3}x\​
but i guess youre probably used to posts getting sloppy?
Yes. That's it exactly.

wait, no, i need to find acceleration when x = 15. i think that's what i posted


yes, this i know, but there are no t's. i assume position is a function of time, and thus i have to reckon with the chain rule. can you elaborate on what you mean?
If you work this out first;
\displaystyle \frac{d}{dt}v=\frac{d}{dt}\left(20-\frac{2}{3}\,x\right)\,,

then you will see that you also need: the velocity, v, when x = 15 ?
 
ahhh yes that makes perfect sense (although i would have never thought of that). the answer is -20/3---thanks! but do you have any recommendations for showing that x = 30 is impossible? i was thinking of:

\displaystyle \ 30=\int_0^\infty (20-\frac{2}{3}x)dt\​
it seems if this is true we would have shown that the only time we will reach x = 30 is in the limit (i can finesse this at the end). any suggestions as to how i proceed?

thanks so much for the advice!
 
joshmccraney said:
ahhh yes that makes perfect sense (although i would have never thought of that). the answer is -20/3---thanks! but do you have any recommendations for showing that x = 30 is impossible? i was thinking of:

\displaystyle \ 30=\int_0^\infty (20-\frac{2}{3}x)dt\​
it seems if this is true we would have shown that the only time we will reach x = 30 is in the limit (i can finesse this at the end). any suggestions as to how i proceed?

thanks so much for the advice!

\displaystyle \ 30=\int_0^\infty (20-\frac{2}{3}x)dt\​

How would you go about showing that?

I would just solve the differential equation ##\displaystyle \frac{dx}{dt} = 20 - \frac{2}{3}x## to get ##x## in terms of ##t## then prove that ##x<30## for all ##t##.
 
you guys are too smart. thanks!
 
Back
Top