Velocity based frictional force equations

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a problem involving variable frictional forces, specifically using the equation -mkv^2=F under the assumption of constant driving force. The user sets up the F=ma equation, manipulates it to derive dt, and integrates both sides, leading to a complex equation that does not simplify easily. They seek clarification on the limits of integration, realizing that initial velocity Vo corresponds to time t=0. The interaction concludes with the user expressing gratitude for the assistance and a newfound clarity on the topic, along with a commitment to using LaTeX for future work.
abertram28
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
Im doing a problem with variable frictional forces.

My main equation is -mkv^2=F . We are to assume the force driving the object remains constant, kinda like a boat on the lake full bore.

So, I set my F=ma equation up.
-mkv^2=m(dv/dt)

Next I removed m and inverted both equations to solve for dt.
-dv/(kv^2)=dt

Next I intetegrated both sides seperately. I was taught to use a "dummy variable" by marking v and t somehow. I simply chose to use a superscript prime marking on my paper. anyhow... Ill use a little v for real velocity and big V for dummy velocity.
(1/kV)|0 to v = t

Isnt that (1/kv) - (1/0) ?

This equation doesn't solve nicely. In my setup I am given the equation for velocity and only asked to show how I got it.
V=Vo / (1 + Vo*kt)

Please help... I posted part of this problem over in classical when I had a different problem with it, so please don't flame me for double posting or spamming the board. If that's your opinion I couldn't care less.

TIA to anyone who helps!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let me see

F = -mkv^2

m \frac{dv}{dt} = -mkv^2

-\frac{dv}{kv^2} = dt

\int^{v}_{v_{o}} -\frac{dv}{kv^2} = \int^{t}_{0} dt

\frac{1}{kv}]^{v}_{v_{o}} = t]^{t}_{0}

\frac{1}{kv} - \frac{1}{kv_{o}}= t - 0
 
Hey, cyclovenom!

Thanks, all the examples we did in class used velocity starting at 0.. I didnt understand the part where we get limits of integration from. now it makes perfect sense, v=0 at t=0, so the lower limits are 0 and 0. in this case, v=Vo at t=0

Thanks for helping me out! I am totally clear, AND I am going to start using latex! woot!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top