Velocity Calculation with c^2 Substitution

ccb056
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
If this equation is true:
V=(V1+V2)/(1+(V1*V2)/c^2)

Then why is it when you plug in c^2 for both V1 and V2 you get the total velocity as 2m/s
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't.. you get c.

V = \frac{2 c}{1 + c^2/c^2} = \frac{2 c}{2} = c

- Warren
 
ccb056 said:
... you plug in c^2 for both V1 and V2 ...
This will give a nonsensical result. You must plug in speed, not squared speed.
 
What I meant to say was (3*10^8)^2
 
ccb056 said:
What I meant to say was (3*10^8)^2

It's still meaningless, besides wrong arithmetic:
Putting your value into slots for V1 and V2 yields:
<br /> \frac{2*(3*10^{8})^{2}}{1+(3*10^{8})^{2}}<br />

To clarify, and make a more "accurate" argument:
Let the "velocities" be some big, ugly number on the form: V=kc, k>>1
Then you have by plugging in:
\frac{2V}{1+(\frac{V}{c})^{2}}\approx\frac{2c}{k}
In your case, k=c; hence the approximate value of 2.
 
Last edited:
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top