Velocity of Accelerated Observer in SR: Understanding the Paradox

JD96
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Hey,

I have a question regarding accelerated motion in special relativity. Suppose an observer has a constant proper acceleration α, his velocity in an inertial frame of a distant observer will then be given v = c tanh(ατ/c), where τ is the proper time of the accelerated observer. Since every quantity in the argument of the function is lorentzinvariant, v also should be an invariant quantity. But that would imply, that every observer agrees on the velocity of the accelerated observer at a given moment, which doesn't fit in my knowledge of special relativity so far... is there a fault in my reasoning or am I missing something else?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
JD96 said:
Since every quantity in the argument of the function is lorentzinvariant, v also should be an invariant quantity.

Recall that in order to derive ##v = \tanh(\alpha \tau)## one must explicitly use the fact that the worldline of the observer relative to a fixed inertial frame is ##t(\tau) = \sinh \alpha\tau## and ##x(\tau) = \cosh \alpha \tau##. Clearly under a boost to another inertial frame or any arbitrary coordinate transformation the worldline of the observer will not preserve this exact form because ##t,x## change under the transformation e.g. if I boost then ##t\rightarrow \gamma(t - vx), x\rightarrow \gamma(x - vt)## while the ##\sinh \alpha\tau,\cosh \alpha\tau## remain the same so if I express everything explicitly in terms of the new ##t,x## in this boosted frame then I won't have the same simple form as before for the coordinates of the accelerated observer.

In other words the equality ##v = \tanh \alpha \tau## is not a Lorentz invariant equality because it is only valid in a specific background Lorentz frame.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes JD96
Hmm...
In ##v=c\tanh(\alpha \tau/c)##, the quantity ##\alpha \tau/c## is like
an angle between spacelike radial directions (analogous to the rapidity as the angle between timelike-worldlines from an event).
The origin of these radial directions is the event whose lightcone forms the apparent horizon for the family of concentric accelerating observers.

A boost will essentially add a constant to this angle, which alters your velocity in that boosted frame.

Maybe the best way to think about what is going on is that
if you set your clock to read ##\tau=0##, when you are at rest in that frame,
after a time ##\tau## on your clock, your velocity will be ##v=c\tanh(\alpha \tau/c)## in that frame.
 
  • Like
Likes JD96
JD96 said:
Since every quantity in the argument of the function is lorentzinvariant
The assumptions behind the formula itself are not lorentz invariant - it assumes the spaceship starts with a velocity of zero at time τ=0.

Every observer will agree that your distant observer will observe the velocity of v for the spaceship.
 
  • Like
Likes JD96
Thanks for all your answers, I got it now :)
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top