Velocity of an Object in Uniform Circular Motion

AI Thread Summary
An object with a mass of 0.5 kg is in uniform circular motion with a radius of 2 meters and a force of 4 N acting on it. The attempt to calculate the velocity using the centripetal force equation revealed an algebra mistake, specifically in treating a product as a sum. The discussion emphasizes the importance of maintaining significant figures only in the final answer to avoid compounding errors. The correct approach to solving the problem involves careful algebraic manipulation and understanding of the equations involved. Overall, the thread highlights common pitfalls in physics calculations and the significance of accuracy in mathematical operations.
Argella
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An object of mass 0.5 kg is swung in uniform circular motion. The radius is 2 meters, and the force exerted is 4 N. Calculate the magnitude of the velocity.

Answer Choices:
a) 0.25 m/s
b) 1 m/s
c) 4 m/s
d) 16 m/s

Homework Equations


v = 2piR/T
F = mv^2/R

The Attempt at a Solution


Since I didn't know the variable time, I couldn't use the velocity equation. Next, I tried plugging in the variables for the centripetal force equation and solving for velocity:

4 = (0.5)v^2/2
4 = 0.5/2 + v^2/2
4 = 0.3 + v^2/2 <- 0.3 because of significant figures
(subtracted 0.3 from both sides)
4 = v^2/2 <- 4 because of significant figures
(multiplied both sides by 2)
8 = v ^2
(took the square root of both sides)
v = 3 which isn't one of my answer choices.

Maybe I'm not doing my algebra correctly or maybe I'm not using the right equation, but I couldn't find another equation using the variables I have. If I knew the time it took for one revolution I could use the velocity equation, but I don't know how to find time and I couldn't find an equation for finding it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Argella said:
4 = (0.5)v^2/2
4 = 0.5/2 + v^2/2
There is an algebra mistake in going from the first to the second step. You have essentially turned a product into a sum instead.

On a side note, when taking significant figures into account, do so only on the final answer. If you keep rounding off at each step, you will find that the rounding-off error grows substantially larger after each step, and the final answer you obtain might be significantly off the correct one.
 
Ohh, okay, that makes a lot more sense. I'll be sure to keep that in mind about significant figures in the future, too.

Thanks a lot!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top