Velocity, speed, acceleration and ?

AI Thread Summary
Velocity is a vector quantity that includes direction, while speed is a scalar quantity that does not. There is no direct analogous term for acceleration that distinguishes it in the same way. The discussion also touches on the linguistic differences in terms like velocity and speed in Norwegian. Clarification is sought on whether the inquiry pertains to an analogous word or concept. The conversation emphasizes the fundamental distinctions between these physical terms.
jophysics
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hi!
a very simple question: I know the difference between velocity and speed. I would like to know if there is an analogous for the word acceleration.

thank you for your attention!

jo
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jophysics said:
I would like to know if there is an analogous for the word acceleration.
Not to my knowledge.
 
A simple question, specially not being mother tongue English. What is the real difference between "velocity" and "speed"?

Cheers
 
Vector (velocity) vs scalar (speed).
 
And, to be of even better help than Borek:

In Norwegian, velocity is "hastighet" and speed is "fart" (for those of abstruser educational level, celerity is "hurtighet")

:smile:
 
Are you asking if there is an analogous word or an analogous concept?
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top