Velocity to land 1/4, 1/2, and around Earth

  • Thread starter Thread starter supernova88
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth Velocity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around simplifying the concept of Newton's cannonball to teach students about gravitational motion and velocity. The teacher seeks to explain how a cannonball could theoretically travel distances like 1/4, 1/2, and a full circle around Earth, using simplified calculations. Initial calculations suggest that for a cannonball to fall from a height of 10 km and land far away, it would require an unrealistically high velocity compared to known orbital speeds. Suggestions include using relatable examples like a 100-meter building or a baseball pitch to illustrate the concepts without overwhelming students. The conversation emphasizes the importance of clarity and appropriate assumptions when teaching complex physics topics.
supernova88
Messages
13
Reaction score
1
Member advised to use the provided formatting template when starting a new thread in a homework forum.
Hi, I'm actually a teacher presently undergoing gravitation and circular motion with my students, and ran into a problem I forgot how to think through. I'm trying to explain Newton's cannonball thought process (shoot a cannonball fast enough off a mountain and it will circle the earth), and determine the velocity v from a particular height. I completely understand the rationale behind v=sqrt(G x mass of Earth / radius), but my students aren't ready for that *yet*. Instead I wanted to simplify things and pretend Earth is a long flat surface (I know it isn't) where its circumference is its distance which is d = 40,000,000 m. We would then find the velocity to land 1/4, 1/2, and all the way "around" earth.

Assuming a mountain is 10 km or 10,000 m tall, freefall should take roughly 44.7 seconds if g ~10 m/s^2, and rounding up we get 50 s (yes I know I'm taking a lot of shortcuts but at this level it's necessary). Anyway, the obvious answer is that for a cannonball to fall 10 km and land 40,000,000 m away it would need to travel v = 40,000,000/50 = 800,000 m/s, which equals nearly 2 million mi/h. This is way bigger than the known orbital velocity of things like the space station which are around 17,000 mi/h.

Even traveling half way around Earth (20,000,000 m) the velocity is basically 1 million mi/h.

I did have some luck when instead I looked at a quarter of the distance around Earth and thought of it like a triangle, where the vertical leg (say, facing north) is Earth's radius plus the mountain, and the horizontal leg (east) is Earth's radius. The height the cannonball falls therefore 6,370 km + 10 km, and freefall takes 1128.7 s. Landing 6,370,000 m away to the east, it should go - approximately - 5,643.7 m/s = 20,317.2 km/h = 12,700 mi/h. This isn't quite 17,000 mi/h, but a step in the right direction.

Anyway, that's a long winded way of asking how I can simply demonstrate a cannonball's velocity to land 1/4, 1/2, and all the way around the earth.

Thanks so much in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So I just realized the error in my thinking ... orbits don't take 50 seconds!

I'm still curious for some simple ways to find the velocity it takes to land 1/4, 1/2, and 1 whole circle around the Earth. Thanks.
 
Your ##g## is permanently pointing in the same direction.
real ##g## for an orbit [edit] a circular orbit is permanently pointing perpendicular to the trajectory.
Makes a difference !

THere should be a better way to bring in Newton's cannonball, but I can't oversee what resources there are available.

I wouldn't dream of misleading my students in the way you propose -- too much risk of confusing average students (and losing your credibility with the bright ones !).

But then again, I don't teach :rolleyes: .
 
Last edited:
Thanks, BvU, I'm starting to think I'm over reaching with this problem and, yes, making too many assumptions. However now I just want to know what the right answer is for myself. Thanks for the insight that g is tangential!
 
You might be better off to use numbers that the students can wrap their minds around. Start with a building 100 meters tall, and throw a baseball at 30 meters per second, while emphasizing that "we are ignoring air resistance". Calculate the distance and show with a sketch. Point out that this is roughly the velocity that a good pitcher can throw a baseball.

Then 1000 m/sec for a high velocity rifle for two cases: flat earth, and round earth. Show the trajectory on a diagram with both a flat and curved earth.

Then 7800 m/sec for a science fiction gun. Show the intersection with a flat earth, and how it never hits a round earth.
 
  • Like
Likes BvU
If your class knows about centripetal acceleration, you can calculate for them the speed ##v## of a satellite at a grazing orbit around the Earth using ##a_C=g=v^2/R_E##, where ##R_{Earth}##. That should open the door to estimating the time to any point on the surface of the Earth assuming a circular trajectory of an object in free fall.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top