Verification of the Divergence Theorem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on verifying the Divergence Theorem using the vector field \(\mathbf{F}=\mathbf{i}+\mathbf{j}+\mathbf{k}\) and a cone defined by \(z=\sqrt{x^2+y^2}\) below the plane \(z=1\). The right-hand side of the theorem evaluates to zero since \(\nabla\cdot\mathbf{F}=0\). The surface integral over the top of the cone yields \(\frac{\pi}{2}\), while the integral over the lateral surface results in \(-\sqrt{2}\pi\). The discrepancy in results indicates an error in calculating the unit normal for the lateral surface, which needs to be addressed to confirm the theorem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus, specifically the Divergence Theorem.
  • Familiarity with surface integrals and volume integrals.
  • Knowledge of vector fields and their divergence.
  • Ability to compute unit normals for parametrized surfaces.
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the Divergence Theorem and its applications in vector calculus.
  • Learn how to compute surface integrals over different geometries, particularly cones.
  • Study the process of finding unit normals for parametrized surfaces in three dimensions.
  • Practice problems involving vector fields and their divergence to solidify understanding.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are working with vector calculus and need to verify the Divergence Theorem in practical scenarios.

haroldholt
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
The question I was given asks to verify the divergence theorem by showing that both sides of the theorem show the same result. With the divergence theorem obviously being \iint_S\mathbf{F}\cdot\mathbf{n}\,dS = \iiint_V \nabla\cdot\mathbf{F}\,dV.

The vector field is \mathbf{F}=\mathbf{i}+\mathbf{j}+\mathbf{k} and the surface through which it is flowing is the cone z=\sqrt{x^2+y^2} below the plane z = 1.

Firstly, as far as I can tell, \iiint_V \nabla\cdot\mathbf{F}\,dV = 0 since \nabla\cdot\mathbf{F} = 0 which covers the right hand side of the divergence theorem.

So then I divided the surface into two, that is the top of the cone and the rest of the cone.

For the top of the cone I got the surface integral as \frac{\pi}{2} since \mathbf{F}\cdot\mathbf{n} = (\mathbf{i}+\mathbf{j}+\mathbf{k})\cdot(\mathbf{k}) = 1 so then you're just left with the surface integral of 1 which by definition is the area of the surface. And since the radius is \sqrt{\frac{1}{2}}, the area is \frac{\pi}{2}.

Now for the other surface I found the unit normal to be \frac{\cos{t}+\sin{t}-1}{\sqrt{2}} after parametrizing the surface as \mathbf{r} = z\cos{t}\mathbf{i} + z\sin{t}\mathbf{j} + z\mathbf{k} thus finding \iint_S\mathbf{F}\cdot\mathbf{n}\,dS = -\sqrt{2}\pi.

Obviously I wanted the result to be -\frac{\pi}{2} so that the total surface integral would be equal to zero which would verify the divergence theorem for this problem. But it's not and I can't figure out where I went wrong. Since -\sqrt{2}\pi is fairly close to -\frac{\pi}{2} I figure I'm on the right track at least with my working.

Hope this makes sense and thank you in advance for any assistance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
on the upper surface, z=1 so you get x^2+y^2=1 is eqn of circle radius 1 and so your upper integral should be \pi.

how did you find the normal - you haven't specified a direction for the unit normal so at the moment it's just a scalar.
 
latentcorpse said:
on the upper surface, z=1 so you get x^2+y^2=1 is eqn of circle radius 1 and so your upper integral should be \pi.

how did you find the normal - you haven't specified a direction for the unit normal so at the moment it's just a scalar.

Oh yes of course. Stupid mistake on my behalf. But if the integral of the top surface is \pi I still don't get the correct answer.

I found the unit normal using \frac{\partial{\mathbf{r}}}{\partial{t}}\times\frac{\partial{\mathbf{r}}}{\partial{z}} then dividing the result by the magnitude. There's supposed to be an i, j and k on the 3 different terms in the unit normal, my bad.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
974
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K