haroldholt
- 21
- 0
The question I was given asks to verify the divergence theorem by showing that both sides of the theorem show the same result. With the divergence theorem obviously being [itex]\iint_S\mathbf{F}\cdot\mathbf{n}\,dS = \iiint_V \nabla\cdot\mathbf{F}\,dV[/itex].
The vector field is [itex]\mathbf{F}=\mathbf{i}+\mathbf{j}+\mathbf{k}[/itex] and the surface through which it is flowing is the cone [itex]z=\sqrt{x^2+y^2}[/itex] below the plane [itex]z = 1[/itex].
Firstly, as far as I can tell, [itex]\iiint_V \nabla\cdot\mathbf{F}\,dV = 0[/itex] since [itex]\nabla\cdot\mathbf{F} = 0[/itex] which covers the right hand side of the divergence theorem.
So then I divided the surface into two, that is the top of the cone and the rest of the cone.
For the top of the cone I got the surface integral as [itex]\frac{\pi}{2}[/itex] since [itex]\mathbf{F}\cdot\mathbf{n} = (\mathbf{i}+\mathbf{j}+\mathbf{k})\cdot(\mathbf{k}) = 1[/itex] so then you're just left with the surface integral of 1 which by definition is the area of the surface. And since the radius is [itex]\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}}[/itex], the area is [itex]\frac{\pi}{2}[/itex].
Now for the other surface I found the unit normal to be [itex]\frac{\cos{t}+\sin{t}-1}{\sqrt{2}}[/itex] after parametrizing the surface as [itex]\mathbf{r} = z\cos{t}\mathbf{i} + z\sin{t}\mathbf{j} + z\mathbf{k}[/itex] thus finding [itex]\iint_S\mathbf{F}\cdot\mathbf{n}\,dS = -\sqrt{2}\pi[/itex].
Obviously I wanted the result to be [itex]-\frac{\pi}{2}[/itex] so that the total surface integral would be equal to zero which would verify the divergence theorem for this problem. But it's not and I can't figure out where I went wrong. Since [itex]-\sqrt{2}\pi[/itex] is fairly close to [itex]-\frac{\pi}{2}[/itex] I figure I'm on the right track at least with my working.
Hope this makes sense and thank you in advance for any assistance.
The vector field is [itex]\mathbf{F}=\mathbf{i}+\mathbf{j}+\mathbf{k}[/itex] and the surface through which it is flowing is the cone [itex]z=\sqrt{x^2+y^2}[/itex] below the plane [itex]z = 1[/itex].
Firstly, as far as I can tell, [itex]\iiint_V \nabla\cdot\mathbf{F}\,dV = 0[/itex] since [itex]\nabla\cdot\mathbf{F} = 0[/itex] which covers the right hand side of the divergence theorem.
So then I divided the surface into two, that is the top of the cone and the rest of the cone.
For the top of the cone I got the surface integral as [itex]\frac{\pi}{2}[/itex] since [itex]\mathbf{F}\cdot\mathbf{n} = (\mathbf{i}+\mathbf{j}+\mathbf{k})\cdot(\mathbf{k}) = 1[/itex] so then you're just left with the surface integral of 1 which by definition is the area of the surface. And since the radius is [itex]\sqrt{\frac{1}{2}}[/itex], the area is [itex]\frac{\pi}{2}[/itex].
Now for the other surface I found the unit normal to be [itex]\frac{\cos{t}+\sin{t}-1}{\sqrt{2}}[/itex] after parametrizing the surface as [itex]\mathbf{r} = z\cos{t}\mathbf{i} + z\sin{t}\mathbf{j} + z\mathbf{k}[/itex] thus finding [itex]\iint_S\mathbf{F}\cdot\mathbf{n}\,dS = -\sqrt{2}\pi[/itex].
Obviously I wanted the result to be [itex]-\frac{\pi}{2}[/itex] so that the total surface integral would be equal to zero which would verify the divergence theorem for this problem. But it's not and I can't figure out where I went wrong. Since [itex]-\sqrt{2}\pi[/itex] is fairly close to [itex]-\frac{\pi}{2}[/itex] I figure I'm on the right track at least with my working.
Hope this makes sense and thank you in advance for any assistance.