Verify whether eigenfunction or not?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Reshma
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenfunction
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 4K views
Reshma
Messages
749
Reaction score
6
The wavefunction of a particle moving inside a one dimensional box of length L is non-zero only for 0<x<L.
The normalised wavefunction is given by:
[tex]\psi (x) = \sqrt{\frac{2}{L}}\sin \frac{n\pi x}{L}[/tex]
Is this wavefunction an eigenfunction of the x-component of the momentum operator [itex]\vec p = -i\hbar \vec \nabla[/itex]

My work:
I computed the partial derivative of [itex]\psi[/tex] with respect to 'x'. I got:<br /> [tex]\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x} = \sqrt{\frac{2}{L}}\left(\frac{n\pi}{L}\right)\cos \frac{n\pi x}{L}[/tex]<br /> I don't think it is an eigenfunction of the operator but I don't know how to justify my answer. Help needed...[/itex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, what is the definition of an eigenfunction? Does this fit the definition? Since your operator involves an i you might want to put the function in complex form:
[tex]sin(\frac{n\pic x}{L})= \frac{e^{\frac{n\pi x}{L}}- e^{-\frac{n\pi x}{L}}}{2}[/tex].
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The function should return from the operator exactly as is, except for a multiplicative scaling factor. It does not in this case.
 
Well there you go, it's not an eigenfunction then. And you should not expect it to be an eigenfunction, because that wavefunction represents a particle which could either be traveling to the right or to the left.

If you rewrite the sine function in terms of complex exponentials as HallsofIvy suggested, you will see explicitly that your wavefunction is a superposition of two momentum eigenstates.