Verifying Vector Space Properties of $\mathbb{R}^2$

indigojoker
Messages
240
Reaction score
0
let \mathbb{R}^2 be a set containing all possible columns:

\left( \begin{array}{cc} a \\ b \right)

where a, b are arbitrary real numbers.

show under scalar multiplication and vector addition \mathbb{R}^2 is indeed a vector space over the real number field.

I will check the eight axioms:

X=\left( \begin{array}{cc} a \\ b \right)
Y=\left( \begin{array}{cc} c \\ d \right)
Z=\left( \begin{array}{cc} e \\ f \right)

X,Y,Z \Epsilon \mathbb{R}^2

Vector addition is associative:

X+(Y+Z)=(X+Y)+Z
\left[ \begin{array}{cc} a+c+e \\ b+d+f \right]
=\left[ \begin{array}{cc} a+c+e \\ b+d+f \right]

Vector addition is commutative:

X+Y=Y+X
\left( \begin{array}{cc} a+c \\ b+d \right)
=\left( \begin{array}{cc} c+a \\ b+d \right)

Vector addition has an identity element:

\Theta=\left( \begin{array}{cc} 0 \\ 0 \right)

\Theta+X=X

\left( \begin{array}{cc} 0 \\ 0 \right) +\left( \begin{array}{cc} a \\ b \right) = \left( \begin{array}{cc} a \\ b \right)

Inverse Element:

X=\left[ \begin{array}{cc} a \\ b \right]
W=\left[ \begin{array}{cc} -a \\ -b \right]

X+W=0

\left[ \begin{array}{cc} a \\ b \right] +\left[ \begin{array}{cc} -a \\ -b \right] = \left[ \begin{array}{cc} 0 \\ 0 \right]

Distributivity holds for scalar multiplication over vector addition:

\alpha(X+Y)=\alpha X+\alpha Y
\alpha\letf(\left[ \begin{array}{cc} a \\ b \right] +\left[ \begin{array}{cc} c \\ d \right]\right)=\alpha\letf(\left[ \begin{array}{cc} a+c \\ b+d \right]=\alpha X+\alphaY

Distributivity holds for scalar multiplication over field addition:

(\alpha+\beta)X=\alphaX+\betaX

(\alpha+\beta)\left[ \begin{array}{cc} a \\ b \right] =\left[ \begin{array}{cc} a(\alpha+\beta) \\ b(\alpha+\beta) \right]=\left[ \begin{array}{cc} a\alpha+a\beta \\ b\alpha+b\beta) \right] =\alphaX+\betaX

Scalar multiplication is compatible with multiplication in the field of scalars:

a(bX)=(ab)X=abX

\alpha\left(\beta \left[ \begin{array}{cc} a \\ b \right] \right) = \alpha\left(\left[ \begin{array}{cc} a\beta \\ b\beta \right] \right) = \left[ \begin{array}{cc} a\alpha\beta \\ b\alpha\beta \right]

\alpha(\beta X)=(\alpha \beta) X= \alpha \beta X

Scalar multiplication has an identity element:

F=\left[ \begin{array}{cc} 1 \\ 1 \right]

such that FX=X


I don't know if this is what I have to do to show R^2 is a vector space. did I do this correct?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
to answer your last question, you said at the beginning you would check the 8 axioms. can you tell whether you did or not? looks ok to me but i think you should learn to check those things yourself. verifying axioms is usually pretty trivial & anyone should be able to do it in their sleep. (after a bit of practice of course)
 
Last edited:
I think you should say why your statements are true. For example when you check associativity, say why it's true - it's true because of associativity of real numbers.
 
indigojoker said:
Scalar multiplication has an identity element:

F=\left[ \begin{array}{cc} 1 \\ 1 \end{array}\right]


such that FX=X

No, Scalar multiplication involves scalars! The identity is the NUMBER 1.

(By the way, you need a "\end{array}" before "\right]".)
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top