Vertical Velocity Graph versus Time on a Slope

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the modeling of a ball's bounce in relation to its vertical velocity over time on a slope. It questions whether the velocity changes from negative to positive instantly or gradually during the bounce. The consensus is that the change occurs over a very small time interval rather than instantaneously, suggesting a need for a steep but solid line rather than dotted lines. Additionally, the importance of avoiding sharp corners in the graph is emphasized to reflect continuous motion without discontinuities. Simplifications in graphing are acknowledged as common for convenience, despite the nuances of real-world physics.
mancity
Messages
26
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
A soccer ball is kicked up a hill with a flat top, as shown. The ball bounces twice on the hill, at the points shown, then lands on the top and begins rolling horizontally. Which of the following shows the vertical component of its velocity as a function of time?
Attached is the picture, along with the answer choices.
Relevant Equations
KE+PE=ME
I understand that through process of elimination the only plausible solution is (E), but a question that rises up:

When the ball bounces, does the velocity change from negative to positive instantly (as shown by the dotted lines) or gradually (a very small time period, but still solid line)?
Screen Shot 2023-12-08 at 11.28.09 PM.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The answer depends on how ideally you model the bounce. Of course, in the real world, the collision occurs smoothly over some time.
 
mancity said:
When the ball bounces, does the velocity change from negative to positive instantly (as shown by the dotted lines) or gradually (a very small time period, but still solid line)?
Not instantly, but over some (typically very small) time-interval. A solid, very steep line during each impact would have been better.

Also, there should be no 'sharp corners’ where two straight line-sections meet; the junction should be rounded. Motion is continuous - no discontinuities.

But it is common to simplify graphs for convenience.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...

Similar threads

Back
Top