Vertical Velocity Graph versus Time on a Slope

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the modeling of a ball's bounce in relation to its vertical velocity over time on a slope. It questions whether the velocity changes from negative to positive instantly or gradually during the bounce. The consensus is that the change occurs over a very small time interval rather than instantaneously, suggesting a need for a steep but solid line rather than dotted lines. Additionally, the importance of avoiding sharp corners in the graph is emphasized to reflect continuous motion without discontinuities. Simplifications in graphing are acknowledged as common for convenience, despite the nuances of real-world physics.
mancity
Messages
26
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
A soccer ball is kicked up a hill with a flat top, as shown. The ball bounces twice on the hill, at the points shown, then lands on the top and begins rolling horizontally. Which of the following shows the vertical component of its velocity as a function of time?
Attached is the picture, along with the answer choices.
Relevant Equations
KE+PE=ME
I understand that through process of elimination the only plausible solution is (E), but a question that rises up:

When the ball bounces, does the velocity change from negative to positive instantly (as shown by the dotted lines) or gradually (a very small time period, but still solid line)?
Screen Shot 2023-12-08 at 11.28.09 PM.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The answer depends on how ideally you model the bounce. Of course, in the real world, the collision occurs smoothly over some time.
 
mancity said:
When the ball bounces, does the velocity change from negative to positive instantly (as shown by the dotted lines) or gradually (a very small time period, but still solid line)?
Not instantly, but over some (typically very small) time-interval. A solid, very steep line during each impact would have been better.

Also, there should be no 'sharp corners’ where two straight line-sections meet; the junction should be rounded. Motion is continuous - no discontinuities.

But it is common to simplify graphs for convenience.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K