Vertical Velocity Graph versus Time on a Slope

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the modeling of a ball's bounce in relation to its vertical velocity over time on a slope. It questions whether the velocity changes from negative to positive instantly or gradually during the bounce. The consensus is that the change occurs over a very small time interval rather than instantaneously, suggesting a need for a steep but solid line rather than dotted lines. Additionally, the importance of avoiding sharp corners in the graph is emphasized to reflect continuous motion without discontinuities. Simplifications in graphing are acknowledged as common for convenience, despite the nuances of real-world physics.
mancity
Messages
26
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
A soccer ball is kicked up a hill with a flat top, as shown. The ball bounces twice on the hill, at the points shown, then lands on the top and begins rolling horizontally. Which of the following shows the vertical component of its velocity as a function of time?
Attached is the picture, along with the answer choices.
Relevant Equations
KE+PE=ME
I understand that through process of elimination the only plausible solution is (E), but a question that rises up:

When the ball bounces, does the velocity change from negative to positive instantly (as shown by the dotted lines) or gradually (a very small time period, but still solid line)?
Screen Shot 2023-12-08 at 11.28.09 PM.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The answer depends on how ideally you model the bounce. Of course, in the real world, the collision occurs smoothly over some time.
 
mancity said:
When the ball bounces, does the velocity change from negative to positive instantly (as shown by the dotted lines) or gradually (a very small time period, but still solid line)?
Not instantly, but over some (typically very small) time-interval. A solid, very steep line during each impact would have been better.

Also, there should be no 'sharp corners’ where two straight line-sections meet; the junction should be rounded. Motion is continuous - no discontinuities.

But it is common to simplify graphs for convenience.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...

Similar threads

Back
Top