B Very basic noob question about integers

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter fission
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integers Noob
AI Thread Summary
Negative numbers are indeed less than positive numbers, but when evaluating the absolute value function, the expression |-x| can lead to confusion. The maximum of -x and x depends on the value of x; if x is negative, -x becomes positive and is greater than x. For example, if x is -5, then -x equals 5, which is larger than -5. The discussion clarifies that -x is not always negative, as it can be positive depending on the value of x. Understanding this concept is crucial for grasping limits and functions involving absolute values.
fission
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
hi all so this is a very basic question i think and i feel very bad for tumbling here but still i need to clear this, so from childhood i was taught that the negative numbers are less than positive but now when i am studying limits and functions i came across absolute function and it said |-x| = max{-x,x}. alright seems legit but now the book says that max of the two is -x and that's why function came out positive due to double minus sign, so i want to ask how is -x greater than x or i am doing something wrong here? thanks for ur help
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If x=-5, then -x=-(-5)=5 is larger than x=-5.

If x is negative, -x is larger than x, otherwise it is not.
 
It's just something that tricks your brain until you think about it for a second.

Q: Is ## -x ## is a negative number?
A: Not necessarily.

You don't know what ##x## is. If ## x = -3 ## then ## -x =-(-3) = 3 ## which is positive.

I prefer to have the absolute value function written piecewise:

Absolute-Value-as-Piecewise-Function2.png
 
  • Like
Likes fission
duh! lol that was really a simple one xD but thanks everyone for giving a good explanation :)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top