Very low frequency data - thoughts?

AI Thread Summary
Transmitting data at very low frequencies, such as 12Hz, poses significant challenges due to the limitations in bandwidth and data rate, making it inefficient compared to higher frequencies like 1900MHz used in GSM signals. The low frequency may struggle with signal attenuation and interference, which can hinder reliable communication. Current technologies generally favor higher frequencies for effective data transmission, but theoretical advancements could potentially make low-frequency transmission viable in specific applications. Overall, the consensus leans towards the impracticality of using very low frequencies for data transmission without significant technological innovations. The discussion highlights the need for a balance between frequency choice and data transmission efficiency.
Invader J
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
((also posted to General Engineering))

Hi everybody,

I'm working on a concept for a movie that I'm making. It's a fictional movie, but the concepts in it are definitely grounded in current and theoretical science. Coming from a big science background, I of course want the fictional technologies in the movie to be somewhat technologically feasible.

So for the first concept:

Could you transmit data from one point to another, or to one main base station of some sort, over a very low frequency such as 12Hz?

* If not, why not? Is it just a horrible frequency to transmit at? What would be the reasons it would not work?

* If not, are there any technologies, whether current or theoretical, that could make a low frequency like 12hz viable for data transmission?

* If so, how efficient would it be in comparison to (for example), transmitting at 1900MHz (a frequency used for US GSM signals)?

* Any thoughts overall about transmitting data at very low frequencies?

If anyone interested could post their thoughts on this, I'd really appreciate it. Once I get some feedback I'll of course post what the conept actually is. :)

Thanks in advance everyone!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to the forums, Invader!

You don't need to post the same thread in multiple places. People interested in Engineering usually look through all open threads anyway, and It's much easier to have a coherent conversation if all comments are in one place.

I'm locking this thread.

Please direct all responses here
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top