Veryfing ODE for complicated y(t)

  • Thread starter Thread starter rdioface
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ode
rdioface
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


For the differential equation, verify (by differentiation and substitution) that the given function y(t) is a solution.

Homework Equations


y' - 4ty = 1

y(t) = \int_{0}^{t} e^{-2(s^{2}-t^{2})} ds

The Attempt at a Solution


I attempted to take \frac{d}{dt} of y(t) as usual but
1. if I do not try bringing the \frac{d}{dt} inside the integral I can do nothing because there is no elementary antiderivative of y(t).
2. if I do bring the \frac{d}{dt} inside the integral, I can use the chain rule to get
y(t) = (-2) \int_{0}^{t} (-2t) e^{-2(s^{2}-t^{2})} ds
but since my variable of integration is ds not dt, this doesn't allow me to use a u-substitution as I had hoped nor can I think of a way to relate ds and dt.

More or less I do not know how to take \frac{d}{dt} of y(t) and I do not know any other ways to solve the problem.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you have to do it that way? Because it looks like you can solve it linearly.
 
Yes, the problem asks to verify that y(t) is a solution to the differential equation y' + 4ty = 1.
 
rdioface said:
(-2) \int_{0}^{t} (-2t) e^{-2(s^{2}-t^{2})} ds
but since my variable of integration is ds not dt, this doesn't allow me to use a u-substitution as I had hoped nor can I think of a way to relate ds and dt.

I don't think you have to be able to do the integral to identify that expression as 4 t y(t). Since you are integrating ds you can factor out the t.
 
Dick said:
I don't think you have to be able to do the integral to identify that expression as 4 t y(t). Since you are integrating ds you can factor out the t.

facepalm.jpg

Thanks!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top