Vibrational States: Frequency, Amplitude & V0-V2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Winga
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    States
Winga
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Is the vibrational frequency V0 equal to V1?

V0 -> V1, increases in frequency, amplitude or both?

If V0 -> V2, increases in frequency, amplitude or both?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please, define your context if you want answers!

Seratend.
 


Vibrational frequency refers to the speed at which an object or system vibrates. It is typically measured in hertz (Hz) or cycles per second. Amplitude, on the other hand, refers to the maximum displacement of an object or system from its equilibrium position during vibration. It is often measured in meters (m) or millimeters (mm).

V0-V2 refers to different vibrational states, with V0 being the initial state and V2 being a higher vibrational state. The increase in frequency or amplitude from V0 to V2 depends on the specific system or object being studied.

In general, the vibrational frequency V0 is not necessarily equal to V1. V1 could have a slightly higher or lower frequency depending on the system's properties and external factors.

When V0 increases to V1, it could be due to an increase in frequency, amplitude, or both. This depends on the type of vibration and the energy input into the system. For example, if a guitar string is plucked harder, it will vibrate with a higher frequency and larger amplitude.

Similarly, when V0 increases to V2, it could be due to an increase in frequency, amplitude, or both. Again, this depends on the specific system and the energy input into it. For instance, if the energy input into the guitar string is increased even further, it will vibrate with a higher frequency and larger amplitude, resulting in the V2 state.

In summary, the vibrational states V0-V2 can involve increases in frequency, amplitude, or both, and the specific changes depend on the system and the energy input into it.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top