Let's put it this way: they do not violate causality, because causality has a limited domain. Causation is a probabilistic affair, and the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle makes sure that there is always room for fluctuations without violating the laws of physics. Even more so: much of what we deem causation is directly due to the appearance and disappearance of virtual particles, since a number of forces are carried by them. (In any case, virtual particles popping into existence will usually pop out of existence quickly enough, although there are instances in which a virtual particle can become real.)
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles.
Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated...
Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/
by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
I don't know why the electrons in atoms are considered in the orbitals while they could be in sates which are superpositions of these orbitals? If electrons are in the superposition of these orbitals their energy expectation value is also constant, and the atom seems to be stable!