What is the issue with file organization in Vista and how can it be resolved?

  • Thread starter Thread starter leroyjenkens
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    File
AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights significant frustrations with file organization in a specific operating system, particularly regarding music files. Users find that the addition of a "duration" tab does not function as expected, failing to sort songs by their actual length and instead producing a random order. The confusion arises from the distinction between "duration" and "length," with users ultimately discovering that sorting by "length" yields the desired results. The term "duration" appears to be an undocumented attribute, leading to further confusion as its intended use is unclear and may depend on user input. Overall, the changes to file organization have made a previously simple task unnecessarily complicated.
leroyjenkens
Messages
615
Reaction score
49
This thing is a mess. XP file organization was fine, but since when something works fine, people like to fix it (make it not work anymore), they made something simple into another reason to pull your hair out. I'm trying to put my music files in descending order for duration. I had to add a duration tab, because there wasn't one there before. But now that I added it, clicking on it does nothing. I can click on the name tab and it will organize in alphabetical order. When I click on duration, it changes it into a random mess. Does duration mean "random" and not the length of the song like I thought? If I click on duration again, it doesn't flip it around and put it in ascending order, like it does by clicking on the name tab. Instead, it just stays in the same random order.
Sort by duration does this, so does stack by duration. They're the exact same thing as far as I can tell. Let me try group by duration. Oh, it does the same thing as the other two.
I try to view details to show me how long each song is under the duration tab, but it shows nothing under the duration tab.
I've gotten one of these options to show me the length of the songs before, although it was pretty poor. Most were in descending order for duration, but there were some chunks at the bottom and top that were not included in the main order. But each time I've gotten it to do that, I had to struggle with this thing, trying various options until I finally got it to work. This time it's just not showing up.
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
You're looking for "Length", not "Duration". Pretty confusing.
 
slider142 said:
You're looking for "Length", not "Duration". Pretty confusing.

Thanks. Got it pretty quickly doing it by length. Funny thing is I've never done it by length, every time I've gotten it to show the numbers, it's been with duration. So duration is just the stubborn version of length?
 
leroyjenkens said:
Thanks. Got it pretty quickly doing it by length. Funny thing is I've never done it by length, every time I've gotten it to show the numbers, it's been with duration. So duration is just the stubborn version of length?

Duration is an undocumented attribute; in no official documentation can I find what it is supposed to refer to. It is possibly meant to be populated only at the discretion of the end user or file creator, such as the 'author' attribute.
 
This week, I saw a documentary done by the French called Les sacrifiés de l'IA, which was presented by a Canadian show Enquête. If you understand French I recommend it. Very eye-opening. I found a similar documentary in English called The Human Cost of AI: Data workers in the Global South. There is also an interview with Milagros Miceli (appearing in both documentaries) on Youtube: I also found a powerpoint presentation by the economist Uma Rani (appearing in the French documentary), AI...
Back
Top