Visual effects of SR versus GR

TGlad
Messages
136
Reaction score
1
If you are traveling very very fast in a space ship, are there any visual effects produced by general relativity that you wouldn't see from just special relativity?
Assuming we don't get close to large gravity wells like black holes.

Does the acceleration of the ship produce any visual effects due to GR? As SR doesn't care about acceleration, just velocity.

In other words, if I wrote a renderer based on special relativity, would it look wrong as I flew around in space near light speed?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TGlad said:
Does the acceleration of the ship produce any visual effects due to GR? As SR doesn't care about acceleration, just velocity.
Acceleration of ship certainly produce rather weird and counterintuitive effects but they are still SR effects.

There is video that might give some idea:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQnHTKZBTI4"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Great link.
I suppose that acceleration still affects the visual in SR because the ships motion changes during the duration of each light path.

So, could we conclude that a renderer based on SR (Lorentz) equations would be a good approximation to the real (GR) effect, if we stay clear of large gravity wells?
 
The best website dealing with SR & GR effects visualization is probably:
http://www.spacetimetravel.org/

You have to differentiate between SR & GR effects on the one hand, and signal delay effects on the other. The 4D ray tracers they use naturally incorporate both aspects. Here some of their publications:
http://www.sfb716.uni-stuttgart.de/uploads/tx_vispublications/vis05-weiskopf-relativity.pdf
http://iopscience.iop.org/0004-637X/563/1/289/pdf/0004-637X_563_1_289.pdf
http://www.computer.org/portal/web/csdl/doi/10.1109/TVCG.2006.69
 
TGlad said:
If you are traveling very very fast in a space ship, are there any visual effects produced by general relativity that you wouldn't see from just special relativity?
[..]
So, could we conclude that a renderer based on SR (Lorentz) equations would be a good approximation to the real (GR) effect, if we stay clear of large gravity wells?

Yes indeed: SR perfectly handles effects from acceleration, GR only adds effects from gravitation.
 
Thanks
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top