"Once, Dirac asked me whether I thought geometrically or algebraically? I said I did not know what he meant, could he tell me how he, himself, thought. He said his thinking was geometrical. I was taken aback by this because Dirac, with his transformation theory, represented for my generation the algebraic movement in physics par excellence. So, I said: 'I still don't understand.' He said: 'I will ask you a question. How do you picture de Sitter space?' I said, 'I write down the metric and then think about the structure of the terms in the expression.' He said, 'Precisely as I thought. You think algebraically, as most people from the Indian sub-continent do. I picture, without effort, the de Sitter space as a four-dimensional surface in a five-dimensional space.' (Kursunoglu 1990)(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Dirac's hidden geometry: what about the Hamiltonian?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# A Visualize the Hamiltonian

Have something to add?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**