Visualizing field lines with moving current

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating electric field lines between two circles filled with positive and negative charges connected by a resistor. It emphasizes that while the field can be calculated using standard circuit rules for constant current, visualizing the field lines outside the resistor is complex due to the influence of the resistor's characteristics. The field strength near the spheres decreases while it increases near the resistor, leading to more parallel field lines in that region. Suggestions include using simulation tools and calculating potential across a grid to visualize the electric field accurately. Overall, the conversation highlights the challenges and methods for visualizing electric fields in this scenario.
Mr Boom
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Let's say I have a circle filled with positive charges. Some distance away I have an identical circle filled with negative charges. Since the distribution is uniform in the circles, I can just use the center of the circles as points and calculate the field lines between the two. So far so good. Now let's say I connect the first circle to the second by a resistor. If the sum of the charges are so large that it is essentially unchanged for some length of time (as in I have constant charges and constant current), how can I calculate the electric field?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let's say I have a circle filled with positive charges. Some distance away I have an identical circle filled with negative charges. Since the distribution is uniform in the circles, I can just use the center of the circles as points and calculate the field lines between the two.
No, this just works with spheres (unless you take a modified electrodynamics in a two-dimensional world).

Now let's say I connect the first circle to the second by a resistor. If the sum of the charges are so large that it is essentially unchanged for some length of time (as in I have constant charges and constant current), how can I calculate the electric field?
Calculate the field along the connection with usual rules for circuits (constant current in the wire). Use some simulation tool for the electric field, as you probably do not find an analytic solution (except for special resistor profiles where the field is unchanged).
 
mfb said:
No, this just works with spheres (unless you take a modified electrodynamics in a two-dimensional world).

I was thinking of spheres, yes, but I was trying to just use a 2D example.


mfb said:
Calculate the field along the connection with usual rules for circuits (constant current in the wire). Use some simulation tool for the electric field, as you probably do not find an analytic solution (except for special resistor profiles where the field is unchanged).

This was my question. I'm wondering how the field lines look visually outside the resistor by allowing current to pass. I realize there will also be a magnetic component. Will the lines straighten or become more arched?
 
It depends on the resistor. Without the connection, the field strength is larger close to the spheres and smaller in the middle. If the resistor is a long wire with the same resistance per distance everywhere, you modify this - the field strength close to the spheres gets reduced, the field strength in the middle (and close to the resistor) increases a bit. This should make the field lines close to the resistor a bit "more parallel".
 
OK, that makes sense. I'd like to try to do this problem on my own. Any recommendations on how to start this program? I've plotted the static field lines and I need to superimpose the field due to the resistor?
 
I've plotted the static field lines and I need to superimpose the field due to the resistor?
That won't work.

You can calculate it with a grid, for example, and I would solve for the potential first:
\phi(x)=0 for sphere 1, \phi(x)=1 for sphere 2, \Delta \phi = 0 in free space, and \phi(x)=f(x) with some function f(x) at the resistor. Instead of a 3-dimensional simulation, it is possible to use the symmetry of the problem (if the connection is symmetric) in a 2-dimensional simulation to reduce the required computing power.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top