Vito"Do Balls Rolling Uphill Stop at the Same Point? - MarkoDeVito

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkoDe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Balls Rolling
AI Thread Summary
In the scenario presented, two balls of different sizes and masses roll up a hill after experiencing the same acceleration. They will stop at the same height if they start at the same speed, despite the larger ball's center of mass being higher initially. The larger ball's point of contact with the hill will also be higher, but this does not affect the distance they travel up the hill. The discussion highlights the distinction between acceleration and impulse, emphasizing that constant forces influence their motion. Both balls will indeed stop at equal heights under the given conditions.
MarkoDe
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi folks,

I'm imagining the following situation:
Two balls lie at the base of a hill, side by side, not touching. One is larger and masses more than the other. They are made from the same material. Suddenly, they both experience the same acceleration towards the hill. They don't ever come into contact with each other. They don't experience any friction or air resistance.

So my question is, do they both stop an equal ways up the hill?

Thanks!

MarkoDe
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming both balls arrive at the base of the hill at the same speed, they will climb up the hill by the same amount.

Note that the larger ball's center of mass starts off higher because of it's larger radius, and it's initial contact with the hill is also at a higher point than the smaller ball, so after both balls climb up the hill by the same amount the point of contact of the larger ball will be higher by the same amount as it was at the point of initial contact with the hill (if the hill is a flat ramp). Not sure if you were concerned about this minor detail.
 
my question is, why would they both stop?
There is an acceleration and the other forces are constant. I feel you are talking about an impulse not acceleration
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top