Voltage Across Plates of a Capacitor: Easy Explanation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ahmad Syr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitor Voltage
AI Thread Summary
A voltage across a capacitor indicates an imbalance of charge, with one plate holding excess positive charges and the other excess negative charges. This charge separation creates an electric field, which increases until it matches the applied voltage, leading to equilibrium. When the voltage equals the electromotive force (emf) of the source, the capacitor stops charging. Disconnecting the capacitor leaves it with a charge imbalance, resulting in stored potential energy between the plates. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the distinction between charge and energy storage in capacitors.
Ahmad Syr
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Hi there
What does it mean when there is a viltage across the plates of the capacitor please make the explanation easy and I would be so grateful.
Thanks in advance.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Ahmad Syr said:
Hi there
What does it mean when there is a viltage across the plates of the capacitor please make the explanation easy and I would be so grateful.
Thanks in advance.

Simple explanation: A voltage across a capacitor means one plate has excess positive charges while the other has excess negative.

More involved explanation: If there's a voltage across a parallel plate capacitor it means that there are more of one kind of charge on one plate than the other; whether an excess of positive charges on one side or negative depends on how the power source is applied (This is assuming you're dealing with a DC source). Capacitors act like temporary batteries- they hold charge; and that, essentially, is what it means to have voltage across a capacitor.
If it's DC the capacitor will charge up and current will stop flowing in the circuit. When the battery is removed, yet the circuit is still not complete, the charge inside the capacitor will remain. If the circuit is completed with a resistor, the charge stored in the capacitor will flow and the voltage across the capacitor will decrease over time. If the circuit is completed with an inductor the current and voltage will oscillate between the two. All the energy of the circuit, at some instance, is stored as voltage in the capacitor; then, at some other instant, all of the energy of the circuit is stored as current in the inductor.
 
Thank you very much for this explanation but what it reall means when we say the potential difference between the plates of the capacitor is 12 volts
 
And why the capacitor stops charging when the potential difference equals the emf source ?
 
I would say that capacitors and batteries store energy not charge if you mean electric charges. The total amount of charge remains the same in both. As we apply a voltage across the capacitor (that implies a circuit of some sort with a path to both ends of the device) a excess of charge is on one side but a equal amount moves from the other plate in the circuit so charges are separated. This separation of charge creates a electric field that increases as more charge is separated until it equals the applied voltage and is in equilibrium (no net potential around the circuit to move charges) with balanced charges on each plate. If we then disconnect the capacitor from the circuit there is not an excess of charge in the capacitor as a whole but there is a charge imbalance and a electric field (voltage) between the plates that stores potential energy.
 
Thank you very much indeed
 
It's easy to get confused with the common usage of the term 'charged' when dealing with the physics meaning of charge. 'Energized' might have been a better word as the net charge remains the same at zero volts or a thousand volts. :biggrin:
 
nsaspook said:
It's easy to get confused with the common usage of the term 'charged' when dealing with the physics meaning of charge. 'Energized' might have been a better word as the net charge remains the same at zero volts or a thousand volts. :biggrin:

Yes, I'm sorry. That's my mistake. Thanks for clearing that up for those who might not know. :D
 
Last edited:
I've made the same mistake in the past in a casual remark.
Another problem is when you look-up the definition of capacitance it usually comes back with something like this: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/capac.html

If you notice closely it actually says:
Capacitance is typified by a parallel plate arrangement and is defined in terms of charge storage:

That's only part of the story as it's really defined by the geometry of the capacitor's physical structure and the dielectric constant of the material medium in the electric field. The formula is a relationship of charge and voltage to a capacitor's capacitance that's always the same if the physical structure doesn't change.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top