Voltage in Capacitor vs. Power Supply: Conceptual Question Answered

  • Thread starter Thread starter flyingpig
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conceptual
AI Thread Summary
The voltage in a capacitor can equal the voltage of a power supply under certain conditions, particularly in circuits with inductance. Inductance can cause overshooting of the charging voltage, leading to a phenomenon known as "ringing," observable as decaying oscillations on an oscilloscope. Even in the absence of inductance, the capacitor voltage can match the supply voltage within a small range due to discrete charge carrier sizes and thermal energy effects. These factors contribute to fluctuations around the equilibrium point. Overall, while the voltage in a capacitor typically does not exceed that of the power supply, it can reach equality under specific circumstances.
flyingpig
Messages
2,574
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement




I am just wondering, can the voltage in a capacitor ever be equal to or greater than the voltage in the power supply? Probably not the power supply...but is it possible to be equal to?




The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
In a real circuit where there's always a bit of inductance at play, sure. Inductance causes what might be taken as a sort of current momentum that can cause an "overshoot" of the charging "goal" potential difference. When there's more than just a whisper of inductance at play, you can get what's called a "ringing" after abrupt changes in driving voltage -- a decaying oscillation around the final value. This can be seen easily on an oscilloscope view of the voltage in a circuit, such as where a square wave is driving a circuit.

Even if there were no inductance, the capacitor voltage can end up equal to the supply voltage +/- the effect of one unit elementary charge, since the charge carriers come in discrete size. Momentum coupled with random processes due to thermal energy will also slosh the charges around the equilibrium point to some extent.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top