FeDeX_LaTeX said:
Okay, I understand. So what is the r with the bracket over it?
The \hat r is the unit vector. It's nothing more than a way to keep track of where things are pointing. It's just a way to keep track of direction. By definition, unit vectors have a magnitude of 1. Direction is the information that they contain.
\vec F is a vector, and \vec E is a vector field. Vectors specify both magnitude and direction. Here, \hat r specifies the direction, which always points away from the point charge (or in the case of \vec F points from the first point charge to the second point charge, indicating the force on the second point charge -- switch point charges around to find the opposite; the force on the first point charge).
Anyway, don't put too much concern into unit vectors, they're just a way of keeping track of direction.
Can you give me an example calculation? I know how to integrate, I just don't understand what you mean by "integrating over some path"... by V(b) - V(a), are you saying you subtract one voltage from the other?
The equations in my last post only applies to point charges. If you have a different configuration, such as a charged plate, or a charged wire, you'll end up with different equations.
But let me elaborate on the V(b) - V(a) part. As others have made it clear, Voltage (electric potential) is a measure of
potential energy per unit charge. Whenever you deal with potential energy, you must specify some reference point.
For example, suppose you are to measure the potential energy of car on a roller coaster at any given instant in time. A typical choice of the reference potential energy is the surface on which the coaster stands. That way, you can use PE = mgh, where h is the height of the car with respect to the ground/surface. But you could choose some other surface too such as 1000 meters below ground or 10000 feet above the ground. Or if you wanted to crazy and measure the potential energy with respect to infinity (pretending that there is no Sun or other celestial objects besides the earth), change the potential energy equation to PE = -G(Mm/h) where G is the gravitational constant , M is the mass of the earth, and h is the height above the Earth's center.
Anyway, the point is that there is the assumption that electric potential is always in reference to something -- i.e. it's essentially a potential difference. If you measure the "voltage" of a battery, you are measuring the potential of the positive terminal
with respect to the negative terminal.
And like I mentioned before, electric potential (aka Voltage) is a measure of
potential energy per unit charge. It is related to force, but that relationship depends on the particular configuration. My earlier equations only dealt with point charges.
Can you show me an example calculation please? Just to make sure I understand...
(a) How much energy is required to bring and electron from infinity to a distance of 1 meter to another electron, assuming that there are no other charges involved?
<br />
V(r) = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon _0} \frac{q}{r} <br />
V(\textbox{1 \ m}) = -\textbox{1.44 \ nV}.
W = qV = (-1.602 \times 10^{-19} \ C) (- \textbox{1.44 \times 10^{-9} V}) = 231 \times 10^{-30} \ J
---------------------------
Because voltage splits in Series, right? Okay, I understand.
Force and electric potential (voltage) are related. But the relationship is very configuration dependent. So the statement that "Voltage is the push on electrons," is sort of misleading, but probably might suffice for the lay person. While that statement might be okay for the lay person, one needs to make the distinction between force and Voltage when pursuing the details of electrostatics.