Volume Bound By Multiple Solids

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on methods for calculating volumes bound by multiple geometric solids, specifically in the context of designing a detector for an undergraduate thesis. The user describes a scenario involving a cylinder, spheres, and cones, seeking to determine the volume of overlapping shapes and the overlapping density (OD). They mention using MATLAB for calculations but find the process laborious and are looking for more efficient mathematical approaches. The problem is framed in cylindrical coordinates, emphasizing the complexity of finding intersections among the solids. Overall, the user seeks guidance on simplifying the volume calculation of these overlapping geometric figures.
NullSpaceMan
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have a question regarding appropriate methods of finding volumes bound by geometric solids. I can work through the math in MatLab by finding points in common within each solid volume...but it is very laborious and I thought that I'd ask you math people how you would tackle this problem. I am just a poor helpless fizzer.

I am working on designing a detector for my undergrad thesis, and the cones represent a sensor's aperture and the spheres an event.


A basic example of the type of problem I am looking at in cylindrical co-ords:

A cylinder's axis is parallel to \hat{z}-direction and is placed at the origin where its radius = 'R'. The centres of three sphere are placed in the cylinder all with different radii (a1, a2, a3), all of which can exceed 'R'. At the surface of the cylinder are the apex of three cones and normal vectors of each cone base point in the -\hat{r}-direction.

I am interested in finding the volume of the overlapping shapes and the "overlapping density" (OD)..i.e how many solids are binding a bound volume...

..e.g
see: http://www.daviddarling.info/images/Venn_diagram.gif
See the centre area of three overlapping circles, the OD = 3
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
No ideas??
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top