Volume Bound By Multiple Solids

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on methods for calculating volumes bound by multiple geometric solids, specifically in the context of designing a detector for an undergraduate thesis. The user describes a scenario involving a cylinder, spheres, and cones, seeking to determine the volume of overlapping shapes and the overlapping density (OD). They mention using MATLAB for calculations but find the process laborious and are looking for more efficient mathematical approaches. The problem is framed in cylindrical coordinates, emphasizing the complexity of finding intersections among the solids. Overall, the user seeks guidance on simplifying the volume calculation of these overlapping geometric figures.
NullSpaceMan
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have a question regarding appropriate methods of finding volumes bound by geometric solids. I can work through the math in MatLab by finding points in common within each solid volume...but it is very laborious and I thought that I'd ask you math people how you would tackle this problem. I am just a poor helpless fizzer.

I am working on designing a detector for my undergrad thesis, and the cones represent a sensor's aperture and the spheres an event.


A basic example of the type of problem I am looking at in cylindrical co-ords:

A cylinder's axis is parallel to \hat{z}-direction and is placed at the origin where its radius = 'R'. The centres of three sphere are placed in the cylinder all with different radii (a1, a2, a3), all of which can exceed 'R'. At the surface of the cylinder are the apex of three cones and normal vectors of each cone base point in the -\hat{r}-direction.

I am interested in finding the volume of the overlapping shapes and the "overlapping density" (OD)..i.e how many solids are binding a bound volume...

..e.g
see: http://www.daviddarling.info/images/Venn_diagram.gif
See the centre area of three overlapping circles, the OD = 3
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
No ideas??
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top