Volume enclosed by isosurfaces in electrostatics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the area and perimeter of equipotential lines formed by multiple charged points in a plane, where the electrostatic potential is derived from the Coulomb potential. It begins with a single point charge, leading to a circular equipotential line, and then extends to two point charges, resulting in deformed circles or merged shapes depending on the potential value. The conversation emphasizes the complexity of determining the perimeter and area as the number of point charges increases, especially when they are not isolated. The generalization to three dimensions is also mentioned, indicating similar challenges in computation. Overall, the thread explores the mathematical intricacies of electrostatic potentials and their geometric representations.
woertgner
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Imagine that you have N points scattered in the plane. Each point is charged and contributes to the total potential the same Coulomb potential proportional to 1/r. Now consider some equipotential line of the total electrostatic potential. Is there an analytical expression for the surface enclosed by this line and for the length of this line?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
woertgner said:
Imagine that you have N points scattered in the plane. Each point is charged and contributes to the total potential the same Coulomb potential proportional to 1/r. Now consider some equipotential line of the total electrostatic potential. Is there an analytical expression for the surface enclosed by this line and for the length of this line?
If you are saying you want to find out the area enclosed by this line then by simple geometry you know the circle has maximum area.
The potential due to a sheet is diectly proportional to r.
that due to line is proportional to ln(r)
You wrote about the "volume" enclosed by isosurfaces
 
I am not sure if I understood your answer. I rephrase my question in more detail. Imagine you have one charged point in the plane. The electrostatic potential due to this point charge is up to a multiplicative factor: phi=1/r. Consider an equipotential line by setting phi=c. This equipotential line clearly is a circle and it is easy to compute its perimeter and surface. Now consider two equally charged points in the plane. The electrostatic potential due to these two charged points is up to a multiplicative factor phi=1/r1+1/r2, where r1 is the distance from the first point and r2 is the distance from the second one. Consider an equipotential line again by setting phi=c. If c is small enough you obtain two slightly deformed circles, if c is larger you obtain two merged circles forming something like number eight. How to compute the perimeter and surface now? What about a general case when we have N points in the plane and the potential is given by phi=1/r1+1/r2+1/r3+...+1/rN? By setting phi=c we obtain a set of deformed circles around points, which are sufficiently far away from other points and merged circles from others that are not sufficiently isolated. How to compute the perimeter and surface now? The generalisation of this problem to 3D is similar.
 
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top