Volume of a parallelepiped's sign

  • Thread starter Thread starter quasar987
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sign Volume
quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32
I have this problem that reads

a) Prove that the three-product (A.(B x C)) of the vectors A, B and C where A, B and C are not lying in a single plane, is the volume of the parallelepiped whose edges are A, B and C with positive or negative sign according to wheter a right-hand screw rotated from A toward B would advance along C in the positive or negative direction.

With some effort, I did that.

b) Use this result to prove the following identity geometrically: A.(B x C) = (A x B).C. Verify that the right and left members of the identity are equal in sign as well as in magnitude.

I proved the identity geometrically and then I argued that both members were the same in magnitude because geometrically they both represented by parallelepiped of equal edged and all parallelepiped of equal edges have equal volume, hence...etc.

But the sign part, I can't find the trick.

The identity gives |ABCsin(x)cos(y)| = |ABCsin(w)cos(z)| where x is the angle between B and C, y the angle between A and B x C, w the angle between A and B and z the angle between C and A x B.

All of these angles are between 0 and 180°, which means sin(x) and sin(w) are always positive and the negative sign comes from y and z being between 90° and 180°.

If I could show that when one angle on the cos is between 90° and 180°, so is the other it would be done, but I can't find a relationship between any of the 4 above angles except that sin(x)|cos(y)| = sin(w)|cos(z)|.


If you have any idea, let me know. Big thanks!
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If your geometrical intuition fails, you can fall back on proving this relation algebraically.
(If you do this, it might spur you on to find a correct geometric argument!)
 
Is it necessary to use the above result ...
there is an easier without using the above result ...

-- AI
 
Last edited:
Say that again?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top