Vortex Panel Method: Solving for \theta_{ij}

  • Thread starter Thread starter sid_galt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Method Vortex
AI Thread Summary
The vortex panel method uses a specific equation to calculate vortex strength at control points, with the question arising about the value of θ_ij when i equals j. Clarifications were made regarding the original equation, noting the inclusion of cosBeta[i] and correcting the subscript on λ to [j]. The discussion highlights that both source and vortex panel methods are numerical techniques for analyzing flows over shapes, with the vortex method applicable to lifting cases. The aim is to derive the contribution of all panels to the potential at the control point. Resources and tools for implementing this method, particularly for airfoil applications, were shared for further assistance.
sid_galt
Messages
502
Reaction score
1
In the vortex panel method the following equation is used
<br /> V_{freestream}sin \beta_i - \sum_{j=1}^n \displaystyle\frac{\lambda_i}{2\pi} \int \displaystyle\frac{d\theta_{ij}}{dn_i} ds_j = 0

where n is the panel number, i is the control point at which the vortex strength is being calculated and j is the panel which is inducing some vortex at i, \lambda_i is the vortex strength at i and

\theta_{ij} = \arctan{\displaystyle\frac{y_i-y_j}{x_i-x_j}}

My question is what is the value of \theta_{ij} when i = j?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Does anyone know? What is the value of \theta_{ij} when i = j?

For source panels I have read it is \frac{\lambda_i}{2}. But I don't know what it is for vortex panels.
 
According to my reference, your original equation is incorrect. It should have cosBeta to the right of Vfreestream. Also, the subscript on lambda should be [j], not what your equation shows.

Both source panel and vortex panel methods are numerical methods for flows over arbitrary shapes. But because the source panel method has zero circulation it only applies to non-lifting cases. Vortex panel method can be used for lifting cases. The idea behind both methods is to treat the surface as if it were a streamline, i.e. a physical surface does not exist, it is replaced by a flow line. A source panel achieves this by balancing the dynamic pressure of the onrushing flow with an infinitesimal flow source on a surface, which exerts an outward pressure against it. Like air hockey. The table is a set of source panels balancing the weight per unit area of the puck. But try to imagine this system without the table (the table doesn't exist), just the sources. And the puck is the freestream airflow impinging on the source panels.

To answer your question, at least attempt to, these methods are numerical. To obtain a solution for i = j is the whole point of the method. The solution is physically the contribution of all the panels to the potential at the control point of the ith panel.

Just out of curiosity, what are you applying this method to?
 
Last edited:
You may want to check out the resources listed here:

http://www.aae.uiuc.edu/m-selig/ads.html

In particular, see the online utility posted by Professor Kevin Jones of the Naval Postgraduate School:

http://www.aa.nps.navy.mil/~jones/online_tools/panel/about/

He even posts his source code (in FORTRAN). If all else fails, perhaps running your question by him might provide an answer.

Regards,


DuncanM
http://www.rocketscientists.ca/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
InfernoSun said:
According to my reference, your original equation is incorrect. It should have cosBeta to the right of Vfreestream. Also, the subscript on lambda should be [j], not what your equation shows.

Ya, I realized that a few days after posting the question

Just out of curiosity, what are you applying this method to?

To airfoils. To be more precise, I am trying to create a Java program to implement this method.
Thank you for the reply.
 
DuncanM said:
You may want to check out the resources listed here:

http://www.aae.uiuc.edu/m-selig/ads.html

In particular, see the online utility posted by Professor Kevin Jones of the Naval Postgraduate School:

http://www.aa.nps.navy.mil/~jones/online_tools/panel/about/

He even posts his source code (in FORTRAN). If all else fails, perhaps running your question by him might provide an answer.

Regards,


DuncanM
http://www.rocketscientists.ca/

Thank you for the links. The second one is very helpful.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Posted June 2024 - 15 years after starting this class. I have learned a whole lot. To get to the short course on making your stock car, late model, hobby stock E-mod handle, look at the index below. Read all posts on Roll Center, Jacking effect and Why does car drive straight to the wall when I gas it? Also read You really have two race cars. This will cover 90% of problems you have. Simply put, the car pushes going in and is loose coming out. You do not have enuff downforce on the right...
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Back
Top