Wanting to get into nonlinear equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter gambit7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nonlinear
AI Thread Summary
To effectively study nonlinear equations and dynamics, a solid foundation in Calculus and Differential Equations is essential. Recommended resources include "Differential Equations" by Blanchard, Devaney, and Hall, which introduces nonlinear equations, and the two-volume series "Perspectives of NonLinear Dynamics" by E.A. Jackson for deeper insights. A typical study path involves mastering Trigonometry, Analytical Geometry, and progressing through Calculus I and II before tackling Differential Equations. The course requirements can vary significantly, so it's important to adapt your learning based on the specific areas of nonlinear mathematics you wish to explore. Ultimately, a tailored study plan that builds on these fundamentals will facilitate a deeper understanding of nonlinear dynamics.
gambit7
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
What's the best study plan to get into nonlinear equations/dynamics, etc. Let's say we start with Calculus... how far should I go?
Differential Equations afterwards?
What's a typical course tracking into such math?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
gambit7 said:
What's the best study plan to get into nonlinear equations/dynamics, etc. Let's say we start with Calculus... how far should I go?
Differential Equations afterwards?
What's a typical course tracking into such math?

Good for you Gambit! That's where all the interesting things happen in my opinion. First know Calculus and Elementary DEs really well. "Differential Equations" by Blanchard, Devaney, and Hall is a good introductory DE text which also covers non-linear equations at a basic level.

An excellent two-volume series is "Perspectives of NonLinear Dynamics" by E.A. Jackson.
 
saltydog said:
Good for you Gambit! That's where all the interesting things happen in my opinion. First know Calculus and Elementary DEs really well. "Differential Equations" by Blanchard, Devaney, and Hall is a good introductory DE text which also covers non-linear equations at a basic level.

An excellent two-volume series is "Perspectives of NonLinear Dynamics" by E.A. Jackson.

So I figure shore up on the Trigonometry, then Analytical Geometry and Calc. I, Calc. II, then Dif. Eq. (dif E.Q. for all u college people). THEN I can start to specialize? That's where the area gets grey to me (the color grey seems to describe nonlinear math pretty well). Different course prospectus' seem to require different levels of knowledge, there's no real definitive approach, you just have to hope you know enough. Also many of the sylabii I've seen cover wider areas of math including nonlinear equations, and I look to just focus on those.
Looks like your ideas will work though. Thanks!
Maybe in a years time I'll have mastered the art of vacuum fluctuations and the veritable aether of the universe. :bugeye:
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top