B Warp drive research of Prof David Pares

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Anthony11
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Prof. David Pares' warp drive research, particularly his development of the variable electromagnetic drive (VEM Drive), has sparked mixed reactions. While some find the concept exciting and advocate for funding to explore its potential, others dismiss it as unrealistic and lacking credibility. Critics highlight that a geography professor may struggle to secure serious funding for such advanced scientific endeavors. The project has previously failed to gain traction on crowdfunding platforms like Indiegogo, raising further doubts about its viability. Overall, the discussion reflects a divide between enthusiasm for innovative ideas and skepticism about their scientific foundation.
Anthony11
Messages
1
Reaction score
2
Hello, wanted thoughts of Prof David Pares warp drive research. I think it's exciting, even if it doesn't work, I'd like funding to go towards it to explore if it can work, here is his website
www.qed-ne.com
 
  • Haha
Likes AlexB23 and davenn
Physics news on Phys.org
A geography professor that teaches meteorology won't get real funding to make warp drive. Try again Prof, stay in your lane.

OTOH, maybe he can start a meme coin or something?

BTW, sorry, I didn't read the link beyond this:
"After years of research and experimentation, we have developed a variable electromagnetic drive (VEM Drive) that can compress the fabric of space which creates a warp field."

I'm not remotely close to being a GR expert, but even I know this is complete BS.
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Likes sophiecentaur, SergejMaterov, bob012345 and 2 others
I think they have been watching too much Star Trek, and have lost touch with reality. They failed to get funding through indiegogo.
 
  • Agree
Likes AlexB23
Anthony11 said:
Hello, wanted thoughts of Prof David Pares warp drive research. I think it's exciting, even if it doesn't work
It would be a lot more exciting if it were not total nonsense (Sorry, but you did ask for our thoughts, and that's what they are). This thread is closed.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Sad
Likes AlexB23, bob012345, davenn and 4 others
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top