Was Einstein Wrong About Singularity Theory?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sariaht
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Track
AI Thread Summary
The discussion critiques Einstein's singularity theory, suggesting that if the universe began as a singularity, it would have inflated rather than spread uniformly, challenging the notion of a central point. Participants argue that the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) does not maintain a constant temperature and that the Big Bang occurred simultaneously at every location in the universe. The conversation also touches on Heisenberg's uncertainty principle and electromagnetic forces, proposing alternative interpretations of cosmic phenomena. There is a consensus that many theories surrounding the Big Bang singularity have been largely dismissed by contemporary physicists. Understanding existing theories and their supporting evidence is emphasized as crucial before proposing new ideas.
Sariaht
Messages
356
Reaction score
0
Proof for that Einsteins singularity theory was wrong:

If the universe from the beginning was a singularity, it did not only spread over space instantly, but also kept the same temperature doing this, cause it's said we might observe big bang one day, and thereby it happened there at the same time as here. We would also be in the middle.

Since every point can be seen as an origo in a neverending space, the universe is a net. What else can it be?

Lets say that the net in the beginning were in c, cause all stringtheorists must agree on that.

Looking closer, we see that there are only ins and outs in the vibration, like in a feather. All with me there?

What if the ins could not become outs but moved vice versa, this would explain Heisenberg's uncertainty principle.

Boblock's sink-source equations should cover why ins attracts outs via the electromagnetic force. The rest has been revealed by those stringphysicists.

What do you think so far; am I on the right track?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The universe did not spread. It inflated. We are not in the middle, and the big bang occurred at every position in the universe. The CMB has also not maintained the same "temperature".
 
What's the CMB?

I ment the temperature registered at a constant timedistance from Big Bang.

My point is (among others) that we are not in the middle of the universe.
 
Last edited:
CMB: Cosmic Microwave Background

Essentially, residual radiation from the Big Bang, from which we can calculate a temperature. What other "temperature registered" could you mean?
 
Originally posted by FZ+
CMB: Cosmic Microwave Background

Essentially, residual radiation from the Big Bang, from which we can calculate a temperature. What other "temperature registered" could you mean?

The temperature inside the big bang, T/(4qr2bb).

q = pi.
 
Last edited:
Originally posted by Sariaht
What's the CMB?

nuff said.


As i recall theories of a big bang singularity have been alrgely discarded, i remember hawking discarding his PhD research on the subject. But not sure.
 
Originally posted by franznietzsche
nuff said.
Agreed. Sariaht, clearly before you can rewrite our theories on how the universe works, you must first understand what it is you are endeavouring to overturn and the evidence that supports it. Otherwise, you're just spinning your wheels in place.
 
Back
Top