I Wave conventions: E(x,t) and E(t), E(x) confusion

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter betelgeuse91
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confusion Wave
AI Thread Summary
Waves are fundamentally described by the function E(x,t), which accounts for both space and time. E(t) represents the oscillation of a wave at a fixed spatial point, while E(x) provides a snapshot of the wave at a specific time. E(t) shows how a wave's properties change over time at a fixed location, and E(x) illustrates how those properties vary with position at a fixed moment. Confusion arises in literature when E(x) and E(t) are used interchangeably or when derivatives are taken with respect to x and t, leading to misunderstandings. Clear distinctions between these functions are essential for accurate wave analysis.
betelgeuse91
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
I understand that waves are function of space and time in nature, so E(x,t) will be fundamental description of a wave. I notice that often people denote a wave as E(t) for instance, an envelop function of a pulse. For this case, E is an oscillation at a fixed spatial point x? So that the point x moves up and down as the wave passes through it in time?
And for E(x) this is a snap shot picture of the wave at some time t? This is easier to see (although i don't know if I understand it correctly)
Well then can I treat E(x) and E(t) as like... same quantity in some sense?
Like for example, when I read a Gaussian envelope E(t), then I image the pulse to be Gaussian in space at some point in time...

Thanks for help!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
betelgeuse91 said:
So that the point x moves up and down as the wave passes through it in time?
No, when we write ##E(t)## we're looking at the value of ##E## over time at some fixed point ##x##. Water waves (with ##E## being the depth of the water) are an example: we can describe the wave with the function ##E(x,t)## which tells us what depth we'd find if we drop a measuring buoy into the water at point ##x## and time ##t##; or we can use the function ##E(t)## which tells us how the depth reported by a measuring buoy tethered at some fixed location will vary over time.
And for E(x) this is a snap shot picture of the wave at some time t? This is easier to see (although i don't know if I understand it correctly)
That is correct. Just as ##E(t)## tells us how ##E## varies over time at some fixed point, ##E(x)## tells us how ##E## varies with position at some fixed time.
 
Nugatory said:
No, when we write ##E(t)## we're looking at the value of ##E## over time at some fixed point ##x##. Water waves (with ##E## being the depth of the water) are an example: we can describe the wave with the function ##E(x,t)## which tells us what depth we'd find if we drop a measuring buoy into the water at point ##x## and time ##t##; or we can use the function ##E(t)## which tells us how the depth reported by a measuring buoy tethered at some fixed location will vary over time.
That is correct. Just as ##E(t)## tells us how ##E## varies over time at some fixed point, ##E(x)## tells us how ##E## varies with position at some fixed time.

Ahh... right. Thank you for clarification. In literature, people confusingly use E(x) and E(t) and take derivatives with respect x and t which drives me crazy...
 
Back
Top