Wave equation and fourier transformation

prehisto
Messages
111
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


utt=a2uxx
Initial conditions:
1)When t=0,u=H,1<x<2 and u=0,x\notin(1<x<2)
2)When t=0,ut=H,3<x<3 and u=0,x\notin(3<x<4)


The Attempt at a Solution



So I transformed the first initial condition
\hat{u}=1/\sqrt{2*\pi} \int Exp[-i*\lambda*x)*H dx=
Hi/\sqrt{2*\pi}\lambda)[Exp(-i*\lambda2)-Exp(-i*\lambda)]

integration boundaries are from x=1 to x=2

This condiotions is clear.

Now i have to deal with the 2nd.
Thats the problematic one.

My thought is:
du/dt=\hat{u},only with proper boundaries.
Then maybe i can find the solution to this DE,and it would be my transformed boundary condition?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
OK, you really need to put more effort into writing your post. I can only guess that you're looking for a linear combination of solutions of the wave eqn that satisfies the given boundary conditions.

If that is the question, then...

1) Write out your general solution of the wave equation (carefully).

2) Show in more detail how you're trying to restrict it using the boundary conditions. I don't see you got where you did with the 1st boundary condition. (Since you didn't show enough of your work, it's difficult for me to guess where your mistakes begin.)
 
If \hat u(k,t) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \int u(x,t) e^{-ikx} dx, than \hat u_t(k,t) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}} \int u_t(x,t) e^{-ikx} dx.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top