Wave equation in inhomogeneous medium

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving Maxwell's equations and the wave equation for electric fields in a lossless, inhomogeneous medium characterized by spatially varying permittivity (ε) and permeability (μ). Participants express confusion about the implications of an inhomogeneous medium, particularly regarding whether ε and μ should be treated as scalars or tensors. Suggestions include considering a change to spherical coordinates to simplify the problem and leveraging knowledge of wave equations in vacuum to approach the derivation. The conversation emphasizes understanding the relationship between electric displacement (D) and electric field (E) when ε is not constant. Overall, the thread seeks clarity on applying Maxwell's equations in this complex context.
palpa
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


a) Assuming the presence of sources (J flux density) and (p charge density) , write out Maxwell’s equations in the time domain in terms of and only for a lossless, but inhomogenous medium in which
ε = ε(r) , μ = μ(r).

b) Derive the vector differential equation (wave equation) satisfied by E(r,t) in a source-free, lossless, inhomogenous medium.

(There are lines on the "r"s indicating that they are position vectors)

Homework Equations


maxwell's equations and the equations that relate D&E and B&H (I am not sure about which forms should be used)


The Attempt at a Solution



I am blowing my mind over this but couldn't see what is being meant by inhomogeneous medium. Obviously I am not asked for the inhomogeneous wave equation (it is not in the curriculum), so I thought this was about anisotropic medium where ε&μ are different for different positions, but when I read about it, I've encountered lots of stuff I haven't even heard about (like tensors).

Please give me a starting point. D=εE , but if ε is not constant, it is not a scalar. If it's not a scalar, how is D=εE true? Or is ε a tensor and since it is a matrix I should treat it like a scalar? Then what is the difference of the answer from constant ε&μ wave equation?

Please help I am desperate.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not really the best person to look to for this (I haven't yet done upper-level electromagnetism, just the basic calculus-based stuff), but it sounds like you have epsilon and mu which are controlled by an algebraic function dependent on radius from your origin and you are looking at all of space, yes? So, why not try changing to a different coordinate system (like spherical coordinates), if you haven't done that already?
 
thanks for the response. I am pretty sure that the r there is not radius, it is the vector
r=xi+yj+zk. But while typing that I've notived that using spherical coordinates may simplify it significantly. I will try solving the question again when I have time, meanwhile I would appreciate any other ideas.
 
Maxwell's equations in time-domain uses quabla (d'Alembert operator):

<br /> \square^2\mathbf{E}=\mathrm{some\,fcn\,of\,\mu\,or\,\varepsilon}<br />

Use your knowledge of what \mathbf{E} in terms of the scalar and vector potentials to finish out Part (a).
 
Are you familiar with the derivation of the wave equation in a vacuum? If so, just apply the same general method...
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top