Wave Function Doubt and Derivation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the correct form of the wave function in the Schrödinger equation, with two competing expressions presented: one with a negative exponent and one with a positive exponent. Participants emphasize the importance of substituting both forms into the one-dimensional Schrödinger equation (1DSE) to identify the valid solution. There is also a focus on the derivation of the wave function using trigonometric forms and Euler's formula, leading to questions about the necessity of complex components in wave functions. The consensus is that wave functions are generally complex, which is essential for proper integration in quantum mechanics. Understanding this complexity is crucial for grasping the nature of quantum wave functions.
sarvesh0303
Messages
61
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



I was reading up on the Wave Function used in the Schrodinger Wave Equation. However one source said that
ψ(x,t)=e^(-i/hbar*(px-Et))
Another source had this
ψ(x,t)=e^(i/hbar*(px-Et))

Which one of these is true and could someone give a derivation for the correct wavefunction?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can see for yourself by substituting into the 1DSE.
In fact - that is an important exercise: do that and get back to us.
 
I know I can! But I want to try deriving the 1DSE by using this value. So I want to know another way of deriving it. I read that it can be derived by taking
ψ(x,t)=A(cos(2∏x/λ-2∏ηt)+isin(2∏x/λ-2∏ηt))

where η=frequency
and then the euler formula was used.

My doubt with this derivation is that would every wave (its wavefunction) always be of the form mentioned above.
If so then since isin(2∏x/λ-2∏ηt) is a complex term, then wouldn't it imply that every wave must have a complex component?
This part really confuses me!
 
sarvesh0303 said:
I know I can! But I want to try deriving the 1DSE by using this value.
The 1DSE is not really something you derive is it? You will benefit by substituting both forms of the wavefunction you were asking about into the Schrodinger equation to see which one is the "real" solution. Have you tried this yet? If not - do it. If you have, please report what you found.
So I want to know another way of deriving it.
"it" what? The wavefunction for a free particle or the 1DSE? You have mentioned trying to derive both now.
My doubt with this derivation is that would every wave (its wavefunction) always be of the form mentioned above.
If so then since isin(2∏x/λ-2∏ηt) is a complex term, then wouldn't it imply that every wave must have a complex component?
This part really confuses me!
In general, wave-functions are complex - this is correct. Why would this confuse you? It is why you have to premultiply by the complex conjugate before integrating.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top