Wave Function Units: |ψ(x,t)| - Dimensionless?

tomlry
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
|ψ(x,t)|2 is the probability density.

Probabilities are dimensionless.

What would the SI units of |ψ(x,t)| be, then? Also dimensionless?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In order to get a (dimensionless) probability, you have to integrate the probability density. What else do you have inside the integral besides the probability density, and what are its units?
 
Oh, I see. |ψ|2 is a function and you will only get a probability if this function is integrated.

I only have a wave function for a free particle

ψ(x,0)=Ae-(x-x0)2/4a2eilx,

where a and l are constants that I don't know the dimensions of.
 
$$P(a < x < b) = \int^b_a {|\psi|^2 dx}$$

What are the units of dx, and what units does ##|\psi|^2## therefore have to have, in order that the result be dimensionless?
 
The unit of dx is length, so that means |ψ|2 has to be 1/length for the probability density to become dimensionless.

|ψ| must then be [length]-1/2.

Thank you :)
 
tomlry said:
The unit of dx is length, so that means |ψ|2 has to be 1/length for the probability density to become dimensionless.
|ψ| must then be [length]-1/2.

This argument can be found regularly but it's not quite correct. The right answer is that the wave function is entirely unit agnostic and can very well be treated as unitless.

The reason for this is that a quantum state is really a ray in the hilbert space, or in other words an element of the C-projective space constructed from the hilbert space.

Rays are invariant under scalar multiplication and therefore also the choice of units. Probabilities in quantum theory are also really calculated using a quotient with the wavefunction in both numerator and denominator, as in

$$ p(X) = \frac{\int_X |\psi(x)|^2 dx}{\int_\mathbb{R} |\psi(x)|^2 dx} $$

and any choice of units for the integration variable or wavefunction cancels.

If you use the assumption of a normalized wavefunction you don't have a quotent but just the numerator. This does not change the argument however, because you just take the quotient out of the probability calculation and cancel the units during normalization.

So to sum up, it does not matter which unit you assign to the wave function as it will cancel once you calculate probabilities. So to make your life easier you can just omit any kind of unit.
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
64
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top