Wave interferance and determining an unknown height

  • Thread starter Thread starter chris097
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Height Wave
AI Thread Summary
The problem involves calculating the height of a cliff based on the destructive interference of radio waves from a star. The first minimum of destructive interference occurs at an angle of 23.7° above the horizon, indicating that the difference in path lengths is half a wavelength (115.5 m). The calculations suggest that the total path length (L) is 1370 m, leading to a calculated height of 550.7 m. However, there is uncertainty regarding the correct angle to use in the calculations, prompting a request for clarification on the approach. The discussion highlights the importance of accurately determining angles and visualizing the problem to ensure correct application of interference principles.
chris097
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Radio waves from a star, of wavelength 231 m, reach a radio telescope by two separate paths. One is a direct path to the receiver, which is situated on the edge of a cliff by the ocean. The second is by reflection off the water. The first minimum of destructive interference occurs when the star is 23.7° above the horizon. Calculate the height of the cliff. (Assume no phase change on reflection.)


The attempt at a solution


Since its destructive interference, the difference between the two lengths is half a wavelength (=115.5 m).
So let's say L-D=115.5 m.
D = Lsin(90-23.7) = Lsin(66.3)
L - (0.916)L = 115.5 m
0.0843L = 115.5 m
L = 1370 m

Height = Lsin(23.7)
= 550.7 m


Any idea what I'm doing wrong? Thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
chris097 said:
The attempt at a solution

Since its destructive interference, the difference between the two lengths is half a wavelength (=115.5 m).
So let's say L-D=115.5 m.
D = Lsin(90-23.7) = Lsin(66.3)
I don't think 23.7 is the angle to use here. Did you draw a figure to show what is going on?

The rest of it looks okay:
L - (0.916)L = 115.5 m
0.0843L = 115.5 m
L = 1370 m

Height = Lsin(23.7)
= 550.7 m


Any idea what I'm doing wrong? Thanks :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top