noblegas
- 266
- 0
gabbagabbahey said:no, [itex]h[/itex] is an operator, [itex]e[/itex] is a scalar, they cannot possibly be equal!
[tex]e=e^2[/tex]
gabbagabbahey said:no, [itex]h[/itex] is an operator, [itex]e[/itex] is a scalar, they cannot possibly be equal!
noblegas said:[tex]e=e^2[/tex]
gabbagabbahey said:No, [itex]\alpha E\varphi=E^2\varphi[/itex], so (since [itex]\alpha[/itex] and [itex]E[/itex] are both scalars!) [itex]\alpha E=E^2[/itex]...so [itex]E=[/itex]___?
Dick said:E and alpha are numbers, yes. You want to solve alpha*E=E*E. That's the same as alpha*E-E*E=0. It's a quadratic equation. It has two solutions. Can you factor it?
Dick said:You are getting closer. E=0 solves it. Why do you think E=1 solves E*alpha-E*E=0?
noblegas said:E=1 ==> alpha =1 right?
Dick said:I had really hoped you would figure out that E*alpha-E*E=0 means E*(E-alpha)=0. So E=0 or E-alpha=0. So E=0 or E=alpha. But that doesn't seem to be happening. There is nothing in the problem that requires E=1 any more than there is that E=56, is there?
noblegas said:I've should have caught that ; Its been a long long ... long night.
Dick said:Granted, a long night. So alpha is sort of the fixed constant in the problem, right? You want to solve for E given the value of alpha. Are we agreed that either E=0 or E=alpha? If so then gabbagabbahey and everybody else can take a nap.